Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314826›Full record

ReviewJournal of medical education and curricular development

Enhancing Anesthesia Education and Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review of GASMAN Simulation Software.

Chao Chen, Shengfeng Yang, Xinglong Xiong, Yewei Shi, Xingfeng Zhong, Jing Shi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Chao ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-8755
Shengfeng YangDepartment of Neurosurgery, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Xinglong XiongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yewei ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Xingfeng ZhongDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Jing ShiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Affiliated Hospital of Guizhou Medical University, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

GASMAN software, a simulation tool for inhalational anesthetics' pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, has become essential in both anesthesia education and clinical practice. This review explores its applications, highlighting its effectiveness in enhancing medical education and its impact on clinical anesthesia management. In educational settings, GASMAN software facilitates a deeper understanding of anesthetic pharmacology through interactive and visual simulations, thereby improving students' learning outcomes and engagement. Clinically, it aids anesthesiologists in optimizing anesthetic dosing, enhancing patient safety, and supporting real-time decision-making during surgeries. Despite its advantages, GASMAN software faces limitations such as the absence of physiological feedback and the need for continuous data model updates. Future directions include technical enhancements, integration with advanced patient simulators, and broader dissemination through educational partnerships. This review emphasizes the significant contributions of GASMAN software to anesthesia education and clinical practice and suggests pathways for future improvements and wider adoption.

Indexed as

anesthesiologyeducational outcomesGASMAN softwaremedical educationvirtual simulation

Identifiers

PMID39314826
PMCPMC11418297

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.