ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Imaging for the diagnosis of acute myocarditis: can artificial intelligence improve diagnostic performance?
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Machine learning for myocarditis diagnosis using cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a systematic review, diagnostic test accuracy meta-analysis, and comparison with human physicians.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2025Pooled it
- A narrative review of immune checkpoint inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in lung cancer: mechanisms, risk stratification, and clinical management.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
- Cardiac MRI in MINOCA: Current Evidence, Parametric Mapping Advances, and Future AI Applications-A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Multiparametric CMR in Myocarditis: A Comprehensive Review of Diagnostic Advances, Prognostic Value, and the Challenge of Genetic Mimics.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Myocarditis in the Modern Era: Navigating Diagnosis, Innovative Treatments, the COVID-19 Challenge and the Role of Artificial Intelligence.Cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Diagnosing acute myocarditis in the emergency department-advancing cardiac MRI with a focus on low-field MR applications.Frontiers in radiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myocarditis is a cardiovascular disease characterised by inflammation of the heart muscle which can lead to heart failure. There is heterogeneity in the mode of presentation, underlying aetiologies, and clinical outcome with impact on a wide range of age groups which lead to diagnostic challenges. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is the preferred imaging modality in the diagnostic work-up of those with acute myocarditis. There is a need for systematic analytical approaches to improve diagnosis. Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are increasingly used in CMR and has been shown to match human diagnostic performance in multiple disease categories. In this review article, we will describe the role of CMR in the diagnosis of acute myocarditis followed by a literature review on the applications of AI and ML to diagnose acute myocarditis. Only a few papers were identified with limitations in cases and control size and a lack of detail regarding cohort characteristics in addition to the absence of relevant cardiovascular disease controls. Furthermore, often CMR datasets did not include contemporary tissue characterisation parameters such as T1 and T2 mapping techniques, which are central to the diagnosis of acute myocarditis. Future work may include the use of explainability tools to enhance our confidence and understanding of the machine learning models with large, better characterised cohorts and clinical context improving the diagnosis of acute myocarditis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.