Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314745›Full record

ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2024

Monitoring the sleep health of adults: a scoping review of routine national surveillance systems.

Joshua A H Way, Seren Ucak, Chloe-Anne Martinez, Kate Sutherland, Kristina M Cook, Peter A Cistulli, Yu Sun Bin

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Joshua A H WaySleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6460-3790
Seren UcakSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0002-741X
Chloe-Anne MartinezSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Kate SutherlandSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6106-7303
Kristina M CookSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0503-7166
Peter A CistulliSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7920-4924
Yu Sun BinSleep Research Group, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4954-2658

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: The aims of this review were to identify existing national surveillance systems monitoring one or more domains of sleep health in adults, and to describe the specific sleep health indicators used. Methods: We systematically searched the gray and peer-reviewed literature for routinely conducted cross-sectional and longitudinal nationally representative health surveys that included the assessment of at least one domain of sleep health. The methodology involved: (1) targeted searches of the websites of national and international health agencies and statistics departments for 199 countries, (2) country-specific customized internet searches, and (3) country-specific electronic database searches of PubMed. Results: A total of 19 762 records were identified from both the gray and peer-reviewed literature. Sleep health surveillance at the national level was conducted by 51 countries (25.6%) across 69 national health surveys. Sleep quality (96.1% of countries that surveilled sleep) was the most frequently assessed followed by sleep duration (27.5%), sleep medication use (25.5%), sleep disorders (17.6%), daytime alertness (15.7%), sleep satisfaction (15.7%), and sleep timing (7.8%). Additionally, 34.8% of the surveys utilized multiple sleep health indicators. Conclusions: This study identified three significant gaps in the coverage of sleep health within national surveillance systems. Limited population sleep data in low- and middle-income countries, inconsistent use of sleep-related items in surveys and questionnaires, and substantial variability in the definitions of sleep health indicators. Advocacy for the inclusion of sleep health within national surveillance systems may be warranted given the important role sleep plays in public health.

Indexed as

epidemiologypopulation healthpublic health surveillancesleep health

Identifiers

PMID39314745
PMCPMC11417014

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.