Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314741›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

SPCANet: congested crowd counting

Zhongyuan Yuan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Zhongyuan YuanCollege of Information and Intelligence, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha, Hunan Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Crowd counting aims to estimate the number and distribution of the population in crowded places, which is an important research direction in object counting. It is widely used in public place management, crowd behavior analysis, and other scenarios, showing its robust practicality. In recent years, crowd-counting technology has been developing rapidly. However, in highly crowded and noisy scenes, the counting effect of most models is still seriously affected by the distortion of view angle, dense occlusion, and inconsistent crowd distribution. Perspective distortion causes crowds to appear in different sizes and shapes in the image, and dense occlusion and inconsistent crowd distributions result in parts of the crowd not being captured completely. This ultimately results in the imperfect capture of spatial information in the model. To solve such problems, we propose a strip pooling combined attention (SPCANet) network model based on normed-deformable convolution (NDConv). We model long-distance dependencies more efficiently by introducing strip pooling. In contrast to traditional square kernel pooling, strip pooling uses long and narrow kernels (1×N or N×1) to deal with dense crowds, mutual occlusion, and overlap. Efficient channel attention (ECA), a mechanism for learning channel attention using a local cross-channel interaction strategy, is also introduced in SPCANet. This module generates channel attention through a fast 1D convolution to reduce model complexity while improving performance as much as possible. Four mainstream datasets, Shanghai Tech Part A, Shanghai Tech Part B, UCF-QNRF, and UCF CC 50, were utilized in extensive experiments, and mean absolute error (MAE) exceeds the baseline, which is 60.9, 7.3, 90.8, and 161.1, validating the effectiveness of SPCANet. Meanwhile, mean squared error (MSE) decreases by 5.7% on average over the four datasets, and the robustness is greatly improved.

Indexed as

Channel attentionConvolutional neural networkCrowd countingSpatial pooling

Identifiers

PMID39314741
PMCPMC11419659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.