Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314739›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Joint coordinate attention mechanism and instance normalization for COVID online comments text classification.

Rong Zhu, Hua-Hui Gao, Yong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rong ZhuSchool of Computer Science, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.
Hua-Hui GaoSchool of Computer Science, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.
Yong WangLaboratory Experimental Teaching and Equipment Management Center, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The majority of extant methodologies for text classification prioritize the extraction of feature representations from texts with high degrees of distinction, a process that may result in computational inefficiencies. To address this limitation, the current study proposes a novel approach by directly leveraging label information to construct text representations. This integration aims to optimize the use of label data alongside textual content. Methods: The methodology initiated with separate pre-processing of texts and labels, followed by encoding through a projection layer. This research then utilized a conventional self-attention model enhanced by instance normalization (IN) and Gaussian Error Linear Unit (GELU) functions to assess emotional valences in review texts. An advanced self-attention mechanism was further developed to enable the efficient integration of text and label information. In the final stage, an adaptive label encoder was employed to extract relevant label information from the combined text-label data efficiently. Results: Empirical evaluations demonstrate that the proposed model achieves a significant improvement in classification performance, outperforming existing methodologies. This enhancement is quantitatively evidenced by its superior micro-F1 score, indicating the efficacy of integrating label information into text classification processes. This suggests that the model not only addresses computational inefficiencies but also enhances the accuracy of text classification.

Indexed as

Coordinate attention mechanismCOVID online reviewsGaussian Error Linear UnitInstance normalizationText classification

Identifiers

PMID39314739
PMCPMC11419621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.