Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314720›Full record

ArticlePeerJ. Computer science2024

Classification of imbalanced ECGs through segmentation models and augmented by conditional diffusion model.

Jinhee Kwak, Jaehee Jung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jinhee KwakDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of South Korea.
Jaehee JungDepartment of Information and Communication Engineering, Myongji University, Yongin, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrocardiograms (ECGs) provide essential data for diagnosing arrhythmias, which can potentially cause serious health complications. Early detection through continuous monitoring is crucial for timely intervention. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology-Beth Israel Hospital (MIT-BIH) arrhythmia dataset employed for arrhythmia analysis research comprises imbalanced data. It is necessary to create a robust model independent of data imbalances to classify arrhythmias accurately. To mitigate the pronounced class imbalance in the MIT-BIH arrhythmia dataset, this study employs advanced augmentation techniques, specifically variational autoencoder (VAE) and conditional diffusion, to augment the dataset. Furthermore, accurately segmenting the continuous heartbeat dataset into individual heartbeats is crucial for confidently detecting arrhythmias. This research compared a model that employed annotation-based segmentation, utilizing R-peak labels, and a model that utilized an automated segmentation method based on a deep learning model to segment heartbeats. In our experiments, the proposed model, utilizing MobileNetV2 along with annotation-based segmentation and conditional diffusion augmentation to address minority class, demonstrated a notable 1.23% improvement in the F1 score and 1.73% in the precision, compared to the model classifying arrhythmia classes with the original imbalanced dataset. This research presents a model that accurately classifies a wide range of arrhythmias, including minority classes, moving beyond the previously limited arrhythmia classification models. It can serve as a basis for better data utilization and model performance improvement in arrhythmia diagnosis and medical service research. These achievements enhance the applicability in the medical field and contribute to improving the quality of healthcare services by providing more sophisticated and reliable diagnostic tools.

Indexed as

AAMI classificationAugmentationConditional diffusionElectrocardiogramSegmentation

Identifiers

PMID39314720
PMCPMC11419651

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.