Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314716›Full record

ReviewPeerJ. Computer science2024

Comprehensive analysis of clustering algorithms: exploring limitations and innovative solutions.

Aasim Ayaz Wani

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in PeerJ. Computer science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Study on Natural Background Levels of Iron and Manganese in Groundwater of Yinchuan Plain.Water environment research : a research publication of the Water Environment Federation · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Metabolic trajectories in developing human neocortical neurons.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Nanoparticle Skin Penetration: Depths and Routes Modeled In-Silico.Small (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany) · 2025
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Aasim Ayaz WaniSchool of Engineering, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5151-0084

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This survey rigorously explores contemporary clustering algorithms within the machine learning paradigm, focusing on five primary methodologies: centroid-based, hierarchical, density-based, distribution-based, and graph-based clustering. Through the lens of recent innovations such as deep embedded clustering and spectral clustering, we analyze the strengths, limitations, and the breadth of application domains-ranging from bioinformatics to social network analysis. Notably, the survey introduces novel contributions by integrating clustering techniques with dimensionality reduction and proposing advanced ensemble methods to enhance stability and accuracy across varied data structures. This work uniquely synthesizes the latest advancements and offers new perspectives on overcoming traditional challenges like scalability and noise sensitivity, thus providing a comprehensive roadmap for future research and practical applications in data-intensive environments.

Indexed as

Centroid-based clusteringClustering algorithmsClustering challenges and solutionsDensity-based clusteringDistribution-based clusteringHierarchical clusteringScalability and efficiencyUnsupervised learning

Identifiers

PMID39314716
PMCPMC11419652

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.