ArticleCureus2024
Diaphragm Tracking System That Superimposes Planned Diaphragm Contours on Kilovolt Cine Images During Multiple Breath-Hold Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Abdominal Tumors.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We recently published a phantom validation of our diaphragm tracking system, DiaTrak, on an Elekta linear accelerator with an integrated cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) unit for multiple breath-hold volumetric modulated arc therapy of abdominal tumors, where the diaphragm position was compared between digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) and kilovolt (kV) projection streaming images by template matching. In the present report, the visual feedback of the diaphragm position was added to the reported system. DICOM-RT diaphragm contour data were additionally exported from a treatment planning system to the DiaTrak PC. Following phantom localization by registering the CBCT to the planning CT images, a projected diaphragm contour was overlaid on each DRR image, whereas another two projected diaphragm contours were superimposed on each kV projection cine image every 180 ms after shifting ±5 mm (set as breath-hold tolerance) in the craniocaudal direction during gantry rotation. It was visually confirmed that the projected diaphragm surface was observed within the two contour lines on the kV cine window. The diaphragm registration errors of the localized phantom were also calculated based on image cross-correlation between the DRR and the projection cine images every 180 ms. It was found that the mean diaphragm registration error was -0.29 mm with a standard deviation of 0.32 mm during the gantry rotation. In conclusion, a new interface for the 5 mm tolerance check was proposed to provide direct visual feedback, thereby giving a sense of assurance to the attending radiotherapy technologists. The calculated diaphragm registration errors were relatively small compared to the tolerance of 5 mm, and therefore it is considered clinically acceptable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.