ArticleClinical medicine insights. Pediatrics2024
A Multi-Center Retrospective Database Evaluation of Pediatric Subjects Diagnosed With Methemoglobinemia.
Article in Clinical medicine insights. Pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Rebound paediatric methemoglobinemia from nitroethane ingestion: a case report.AME case reports · 2026Article
- Case Report: Clinical presentations of cyanosis associated with acquired methemoglobinemia in infants-a clinical challenge.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
- A Case of Methemoglobinemia Suspected to Be Induced by Rabeprazole.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Methemoglobinemia requires early identification and treatment, but limited knowledge exists regarding the current therapeutic approach taken by clinicians as well as the outcomes that occur in children. Objectives: To determine the current prevalence of this rare disease in the pediatric population, evaluate the impact of methemoglobin and functional hemoglobin levels, and assess how this disease is approached by clinicians. We hypothesize that methemoglobinemia prevalence is low and more methylene blue use would be observed in subjects with functional hemoglobin levels less than 7 g/dL. Design: This was a retrospective observational cohort study utilizing deidentified TriNetX Methods: Using a multicenter EHR database, we evaluated subjective characteristics, diagnostic, laboratory results, medication, and procedural codes. Results: Ninety-eight children (mean age 5.3 ± 5.3 years) from 53 healthcare organizations were included. Methemoglobinemia prevalence was 0.0015% with an overall 30-day mortality of 6.1%. Subjects with methemoglobin percentages greater than 20% had a higher frequency of methylene blue administration (70.6% versus 24.7%, Conclusion: In our study, we found methemoglobinemia prevalence in children is low, there is a low frequency of G6PD testing despite methylene blue hemolysis risk, and subjects appeared to be treated similarly despite a low functional hemoglobin. These findings highlight the continued critical nature of this disease and may highlight opportunities for education aimed at improving care in children diagnosed with methemoglobinemia, particularly related to G6PD testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.