Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314511›Full record

ArticleArXiv2024

Adapting Machine Learning Diagnostic Models to New Populations Using a Small Amount of Data: Results from Clinical Neuroscience.

Rongguang Wang, Guray Erus, Pratik Chaudhari, Christos Davatzikos

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in ArXiv, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rongguang WangDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania.
Guray ErusCenter for AI and Data Science for Integrated Diagnostics, University of Pennsylvania.
Pratik ChaudhariDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania.
Christos DavatzikosDepartment of Electrical and Systems Engineering, University of Pennsylvania.

Funding

Ultrascale Machine Learning to Empower Discovery in Alzheimers Disease BiobanksU01AG068057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Heng Huang · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Machine Learning and Large-scale Imaging analytics for dimensional representations of brain trajectories in aging and preclinical Alzheimer's Disease: The brain aging chart and the iSTAGING consortiumRF1AG054409 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2023
$6.3M
The Neuroimaging Brain Chart Software SuiteU24NS130411 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI Christos Davatzikos, Yong Fan · 2023 to 2026
$3.7M
Mapping Heterogeneity of Neuroanatomical Imaging Signatures of Psychosis via Pattern AnalysisR01MH112070 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA · PI DAVATZIKOS, CHRISTOS · 2017 to 2020
$2.7M
NIA NIH HHS RF1 AG054409NIA NIH HHS U01 AG068057NIDA NIH HHS 75N95019C00022NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH112070NINDS NIH HHS U24 NS130411
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Machine learning (ML) is revolutionizing many areas of engineering and science, including healthcare. However, it is also facing a reproducibility crisis, especially in healthcare. ML models that are carefully constructed from and evaluated on data from one part of the population may not generalize well on data from a different population group, or acquisition instrument settings and acquisition protocols. We tackle this problem in the context of neuroimaging of Alzheimer's disease (AD), schizophrenia (SZ) and brain aging. We develop a weighted empirical risk minimization approach that optimally combines data from a source group, e.g., subjects are stratified by attributes such as sex, age group, race and clinical cohort to make predictions on a target group, e.g., other sex, age group, etc. using a small fraction (10%) of data from the target group. We apply this method to multi-source data of 15,363 individuals from 20 neuroimaging studies to build ML models for diagnosis of AD and SZ, and estimation of brain age. We found that this approach achieves substantially better accuracy than existing domain adaptation techniques: it obtains area under curve greater than 0.95 for AD classification, area under curve greater than 0.7 for SZ classification and mean absolute error less than 5 years for brain age prediction on all target groups, achieving robustness to variations of scanners, protocols, and demographic or clinical characteristics. In some cases, it is even better than training on all data from the target group, because it leverages the diversity and size of a larger training set. We also demonstrate the utility of our models for prognostic tasks such as predicting disease progression in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Critically, our brain age prediction models lead to new clinical insights regarding correlations with neurophysiological tests. In summary, we present a relatively simple methodology, along with ample experimental evidence, supporting the good generalization of ML models to new datasets and patient cohorts.

Indexed as

distribution shiftdomain adaptationdomain generalizationMRIneurological disorder

Identifiers

PMID39314511
PMCPMC11419182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.