ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Epigenomic, transcriptomic and proteomic characterizations of reference samples.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
A variety of newly developed next-generation sequencing technologies are making their way rapidly into the research and clinical applications, for which accuracy and cross-lab reproducibility are critical, and reference standards are much needed. Our previous multicenter studies under the SEQC-2 umbrella using a breast cancer cell line with paired B-cell line have produced a large amount of different genomic data including whole genome sequencing (Illumina, PacBio, Nanopore), HiC, and scRNA-seq with detailed analyses on somatic mutations, single-nucleotide variations (SNVs), and structural variations (SVs). However, there is still a lack of well-characterized reference materials which include epigenomic and proteomic data. Here we further performed ATAC-seq, Methyl-seq, RNA-seq, and proteomic analyses and provided a comprehensive catalog of the epigenomic landscape, which overlapped with the transcriptomes and proteomes for the two cell lines. We identified >7,700 peptide isoforms, where the majority (95%) of the genes had a single peptide isoform. Protein expression of the transcripts overlapping CGIs were much higher than the protein expression of the non-CGI transcripts in both cell lines. We further demonstrated the evidence that certain SNVs were incorporated into mutated peptides. We observed that open chromatin regions had low methylation which were largely regulated by CG density, where CG-rich regions had more accessible chromatin, low methylation, and higher gene and protein expression. The CG-poor regions had higher repressive epigenetic regulations (higher DNA methylation) and less open chromatin, resulting in a cell line specific methylation and gene expression patterns. Our studies provide well-defined reference materials consisting of two cell lines with genomic, epigenomic, transcriptomic, scRNA-seq and proteomic characterizations which can serve as standards for validating and benchmarking not only on various omics assays, but also on bioinformatics methods. It will be a valuable resource for both research and clinical communities.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.