ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Motility in Conscious Rats.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Gastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can simultaneously capture gastric peristalsis, emptying, and intestinal filling and transit. Performing GI MRI with animals requires anesthesia, which complicates physiology and confounds interpretation and translation from animals to humans. This study aims to enable MRI in conscious rats, and for the first time, characterize GI motor functions in awake versus anesthetized conditions. Methods: We acclimated rats to remain awake, still, and minimally stressed during MRI. We scanned 14 Sprague-Dawley rats in both awake and anesthetized conditions after voluntarily consuming a contrast-enhanced test meal. Results: Awake rats remained physiologically stable during MRI, showed gastric emptying of 23.7±1.4% after 48 minutes, and exhibited strong peristaltic contractions propagating through the antrum with a velocity of 0.72±0.04 mm/s, a relative amplitude of 40.7±2.3%, and a frequency of 5.1±0.1 cycles per minute. In the anesthetized condition, gastric emptying was about half of that in the awake condition, likely due to the effect of anesthesia in halving the amplitudes of peristaltic contractions rather than their frequency (not significantly changed) or velocity. In awake rats, the intestine filled more quickly and propulsive contractions were more occlusive. Conclusion: We demonstrated the effective acquisition and analysis of GI MRI in awake rats. Awake rats show faster gastric emptying, stronger gastric contraction with a faster propagation speed, and more effective intestinal filling and transit, compared to anesthetized rats. Our protocol is expected to benefit future preclinical studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.