ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024
Gene identification for ocular congenital cranial motor neuron disorders using human sequencing, zebrafish screening, and protein binding microarrays.
Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Updated by
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To functionally evaluate novel human sequence-derived candidate genes and variants for unsolved ocular congenital cranial dysinnervation disorders (oCCDDs). Methods: Through exome and genome sequencing of a genetically unsolved human oCCDD cohort, we previously identified variants in 80 strong candidate genes. Here, we further prioritized a subset of these (43 human genes, 57 zebrafish genes) using a G0 CRISPR/Cas9-based knockout assay in zebrafish and generated F2 germline mutants for seventeen. We tested the functionality of variants of uncertain significance in known and novel candidate transcription factor-encoding genes through protein binding microarrays. Results: We first demonstrated the feasibility of the G0 screen by targeting known oCCDD genes Conclusions: This study nominates three strong novel candidate oCCDD genes (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.