Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39314259›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in neurological disorders2024

Yue Li, Hong-Li Guo, Jie Wang, Yuan-Yuan Zhang, Wei-Jun Wang, Jian Huang, Lin Fan, Ya-Hui Hu, Xiao-Peng Lu, Feng Chen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yue LiPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3176-150X
Hong-Li GuoPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jie WangPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Yuan-Yuan ZhangPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Wei-Jun WangPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Jian HuangPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Lin FanPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Ya-Hui HuPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210008, China.
Xiao-Peng LuDepartment of Neurology, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210008, China.
Feng ChenPharmaceutical Sciences Research Center, Department of Pharmacy, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 72 Guangzhou Road, Nanjing 210008, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The widespread clinical use of lacosamide (LCM) has revealed significant individual differences in clinical response, with various reported influencing factors. However, it remains unclear how genetic factors related to the disposition and clinical response of LCM, as well as drug-drug interactions (DDIs), exert their influence on pediatric patients with epilepsy. Objectives: To evaluate the impact of genetic variations and DDIs on plasma LCM concentrations and clinical response. Design: Patients with epilepsy treated with LCM from June 2021 to March 2023 in the Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University were included in the analysis. Methods: The demographic information and laboratory examination data were obtained from the hospital information system. For the pharmacogenetic study, the left-over blood specimens, collected for routine plasma LCM concentration monitoring, were used to perform genotyping analysis for the selected 26 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 14 genes. The trough concentration/daily dose ( Results: Patients achieved 90.1% and 68.9% responder rates in LCM mono- and add-on therapy, respectively. The genetic variant in the Conclusion: This study was the first to confirm that

Indexed as

childrenCYP2C19focal epilepsylacosamidetherapeutic drug monitoring

Identifiers

PMID39314259
PMCPMC11418302

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.