Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313855›Full record

ArticleJournal of Korean Neurosurgical Society2025

Integration of Palliative Care in Neurosurgical Critical Care : Insights from a Single-Center Perspective.

Nam Hee Kim, Yejin Kim, Se Yeon Kim, Hyoung Suk Han, Hye Yoon Park, Eun Jin Ha, Shin Hye Yoo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nam Hee KimCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Yejin KimCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Se Yeon KimCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hyoung Suk HanCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Hye Yoon ParkCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Eun Jin HaDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Shin Hye YooCenter for Palliative Care and Clinical Ethics, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Funding

Ministry of Health and Welfare HC23C0160Patient-Centered Clinical Research Coordinating CenterSeoul National University Hospital 04-2021-0580
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivePalliative care is a specialized approach designed to enhance the quality of life for both patients and their families, offering patient-centered care through comprehensive assessment and care planning. However, the integration of palliative care within neurocritical care settings has been relatively understudied. This descriptive study aims to identify the characteristics, palliative care needs, and outcomes of patients referred to palliative care services during admission to the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NS-ICU).

methodsA retrospective analysis of adults admitted to the NS-ICU at a referral hospital between December 2019 and December 2021 was conducted. The study focused on those referred to the inpatient palliative care team with diagnoses of non-traumatic brain hemorrhage, traumatic brain injury, or brain neoplasm. Excluded were patients who died before palliative care consultation or lacked sufficient information. The investigation assessed demographic and clinical characteristics at consultation, along with post-consultation hospital outcomes derived from medical records and interview notes.

resultsIn this study involving 38 enrolled patients, the median age was 65, with 42.1% females. The most prevalent diagnosis was nontraumatic brain hemorrhage (47.4%). Reasons for palliative care consultation included psychosocial support (95%), goal-of-care discussions (68%), decision-making support (50%), and communication facilitation (39%). The median time from NS-ICU admission to consultation was 3.5 days (interquartile range, 1-8 days), and all interviews involved family members. Key decision topics encompassed mechanical ventilation (23.7%) and tracheostomy (21.1%). Patient preferences for life-sustaining treatment could be estimated in only 47.4% of cases, often resulting in treatment disagreement. Among the 38 patients, 26 (68.4%) died during admission. Before the consultation, full code status, partial code status, and comfort care alone were reported as 32%, 66%, and 2%, respectively; post-consultation, these figures shifted to 11%, 42%, and 47%, respectively.

conclusionPalliative care was predominantly sought for psychosocial support and discussions concerning goals of care. Despite challenges in ascertaining patient treatment preferences, palliative care consultations proved invaluable in aiding family members and facilitating treatment decision-making. Our study suggests the potential integration of palliative care within neuro-critical care, contributing to a heightened utilization of comfort care at the end-of-life.

Indexed as

Critical careLife support careLife-sustaining treatmentPalliative carePatient-centered care

Identifiers

PMID39313855
PMCPMC11924636

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.