ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024
Redefining the phenotype of alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) deficiency.
Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Alpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) deficiency: report on novel patient and literature review.Journal of applied genetics · 2026Article
- SLC45A2 drives prostate cancer progression through tumor promotion and immune suppression.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Peroxisome Dysfunction and Steatotic Liver Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Effectiveness and Safety of Personalized Cholic Acid Treatment in Patients With Bile Acid Synthesis Defects.Journal of inherited metabolic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlpha-methylacyl-CoA racemase (AMACR) deficiency is a rare peroxisomal enzyme deficiency caused by biallelic variants in the AMACR gene. This deficiency leads to the accumulation of toxic bile acid intermediates (R)-trihydroxycholestenoic acid (THCA) and (R)-dihydroxycholestenoic acid (DHCA) and pristanic acid. With less than 20 patients described in literature, the phenotype of AMACR deficiency is poorly defined and no data on the natural history are available.
resultsHere we describe a cohort of 12 patients (9 adults and 3 children) with genetically confirmed AMACR deficiency (median age at diagnosis 56 years, range 3-69), followed for an average of 6 years (between 2015 and 2023). Five novel pathogenic variants are described. In 5/9 adult patients, retinitis pigmentosa was detected at a median age of 45 years (range 30-61). The median delay to diagnosis of AMACR deficiency after the diagnosis of retinitis pigmentosa was 24 years (range 0-33). All adult patients subsequently developed neurological signs and symptoms after the age of 40 years; most frequently neuropathy, ataxia and cognitive decline with prior normal cognitive functioning. One patient presented with a stroke-like episode. All adult patients showed a typical MRI pattern involving the thalami and gray matter structures of the pons and midbrain. One patient had a hepatocellular carcinoma at the time of the AMACR deficiency diagnosis and two patients suffered from gallstones. All three included children had elevated liver transaminases as single presenting sign and showed no brain MRI abnormalities.
conclusionAMACR deficiency can be considered as an adult slowly progressive disease with a predominant neurological phenotype. The main signs comprise retinitis pigmentosa, neuropathy, ataxia and cognitive decline; stroke-like episodes may occur. Recognition of typical MRI abnormalities may facilitate prompt diagnosis. In addition, there is a risk of liver fibrosis/cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma in these patients, requiring active monitoring.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.