ReviewBMC urology2024
Advances in experimental bladder models: bridging the gap between in vitro and in vivo approaches for investigating urinary tract infections.
Review in BMC urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Surface modification of urinary catheters with antibiofilm nanocoating: curcumin modified silver nanoparticles against Proteus mirabilis.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2026Article
- Catheter-Associated Urinary Tract Infections: Understanding the Interplay Between Bacterial Biofilm and Antimicrobial Resistance.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Biofilms Exposed: Innovative Imaging and Therapeutic Platforms for Persistent Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Effect of host microenvironment and bacterial lifestyles on antimicrobial sensitivity and implications for susceptibility testing.npj antimicrobials and resistance · 2025Review
- DynamicAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Urinary tract infections (UTIs) pose a substantial burden on global healthcare systems. When unraveling the complex pathophysiology of UTIs, bladder models are used to understand complex and multifaceted interactions between different components within the system. This review aimed to bridge the gap between in vitro and in vivo experimental bladder models towards UTI research. We reviewed clinical, animal, and analytical studies and patents from 1959 to the end of 2023. Both in vivo and in vitro models offer unique benefits and drawbacks in understanding UTIs. In vitro models provide controlled environments for studying specific aspects of UTI biology and testing potential treatments, while in vivo models offer insights into how UTIs manifest and progress within living organisms. Thus, both types of models are leading to the development of more effective diagnostic tools and therapeutic interventions against UTIs. Moreover, advanced methodologies involving three-dimensional bladder organoids have also been used to study bladder biology, model bladder-related disorders, and explore new treatments for bladder cancers, UTIs, and urinary incontinence. Narrowing the distance between fundamental scientific research and practical medical applications, these pioneering models hold the key to unlocking new avenues for the development of personalized diagnostics, precision medicine, and ultimately, the alleviation of UTI-related morbidity worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.