Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313748›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2024

A hierarchical reinforcement learning model explains individual differences in attentional set shifting.

Anahita Talwar, Francesca Cormack, Quentin J M Huys, Jonathan P Roiser

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anahita TalwarNeuroscience and Mental Health Group, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17-19 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AZ, UK.
Francesca CormackCambridge Cognition Ltd, Tunbridge Court, Bottisham, Cambridge, CB25 9TU, UK.
Quentin J M Huys *Applied Computational Psychiatry Lab, Mental Health Neuroscience Department, Division of Psychiatry and Max Planck Centre for Computational Psychiatry and Ageing Research, Queen Square Institute of Neurology, UCL, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Court Rd, London, W1T 7BN, UK.
Jonathan P Roiser *Neuroscience and Mental Health Group, UCL Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17-19 Queen Square, London, WC1N 3AZ, UK. j.roiser@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/R015759/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Attentional set shifting refers to the ease with which the focus of attention is directed and switched. Cognitive tasks, such as the widely used CANTAB IED, reveal great variation in set shifting ability in the general population, with notable impairments in those with psychiatric diagnoses. The attentional and learning processes underlying this cognitive ability and how they lead to the observed variation remain unknown. To directly test this, we used a modelling approach on two independent large-scale online general-population samples performing CANTAB IED, with one including additional psychiatric symptom assessment. We found a hierarchical model that learnt both feature values and dimension attention best explained the data and that compulsive symptoms were associated with slower learning and higher attentional bias to the first relevant stimulus dimension. These data showcase a new methodology to analyse data from the CANTAB IED task, as well as suggest a possible mechanistic explanation for the variation in set shifting performance, and its relationship to compulsive symptoms.

Indexed as

AttentionIndividualityReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedModels, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsYoung AdultAttentionCANTAB IEDCompulsivityComputational psychiatryReinforcement learningSet shifting

Identifiers

PMID39313748
PMCPMC11525250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.