ArticleDrug delivery and translational research2025
In vitro and in vivo evaluation of in situ forming polyester implants for the extended release of carvedilol.
Article in Drug delivery and translational research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Polyester based in situ forming implants (ISFIs) are injectable long-acting drug delivery systems that offer a wide range of unique advantages. As a result of these advantages, two relatively high molecular weight, ester terminated grades of poly (D,L-lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) and poly(D,L-lactide) (PLA) were evaluated for their ability (i) to form ISFIs loaded with carvedilol, and (ii) to control its release both in vitro and in vivo. At a polymeric concentration of 40% w/w, implant solutions were syringeable, injectable, and able to encapsulate carvedilol to a high degree (encapsulated drug% > 97%). When visualized using scanning electron microscopy (SEM), implants were found to have a dense thin surface atop porous sublayers. As for their in vitro evaluation, PLGA and PLA implants were able to maintain drug release over the course of 49 and 84 days, respectively. On the other hand, in vivo drug release from both implants was almost identical and lasted for only 42 days. This may be due to the overriding effect of the similar host environment at the injection site that diminished the effect of polymeric physiochemistry on phase inversion and drug release. Lastly, while the polymer-free drug/NMP solution completely released its drug content within the initial half hour in vitro, the formulation extended drug release in vivo. This could be due to a yet to be investigated interaction between carvedilol and NMP under in vivo conditions. These results cement the significance of formulating carvedilol loaded ISFIs for the management of chronic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39313736What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.