Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313733›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026

Genetic underpinnings of YMRS and MADRS scores variations in a bipolar sample.

Marco Calabró, Antonio Drago, Concetta Crisafulli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Marco CalabróIRCCS Centro Neurolesi "Bonino-Pulejo", Via Provinciale Palermo, Contrada Casazza, 98124, Messina, Italy.
Antonio Drago *Unit for Psychiatric Research, Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, DK-9100, Aalborg, Denmark.
Concetta Crisafulli *Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125, Messina, Italy. ccrisafulli@unime.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9703-0083

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bipolar disorder (BPD) affects approximately 2% of the global population. Its clinical course is highly variable and current treatments are not always effective for all patients. Genetic factors play a significant role in BPD and its treatment, although the genetic background appear to be highly heterogeneous. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are a powerful tool for risk assessment, yet using all genomic data may introduce confounding factors. Focusing on specific genetic clusters PRS (gcPRS) may mitigate this issue. This study aims to assess a neural network model's efficacy in predicting response to treatment (RtT) in BPD individuals using PRS calculated from specific gcPRS and other variables. 1538 individuals from STEP-BD (age 41.39 ± 12.66, 59.17% female) were analyzed. gcPRS were calculated from a Genome-wide association study (GWAS) with clinical covariates and a molecular pathway analysis (MPA) based on drugs interaction networks. A neural network was trained using gcPRS and clinical variables to predict RtT. Ten biological networks were identified through MPA, with gcPRS derived from risk variants within corresponding gene groups. However, the model did not show significant accuracy in predicting RtT in BPD individuals. RtT in BPD is influenced by multiple factors. This study attempted a comprehensive approach integrating clinical and biological data to predict RtT. However, the model did not achieve significant accuracy, possibly due to limitations such as sample size, disorder complexity, and population heterogeneity. This data highlights the challenge of developing personalized treatments for BPD and the necessity for further research in this area.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderMultifactorial InheritanceNeural Networks, ComputerAdultFemaleGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesBipolar DisorderNeural NetworkPRSResponse to Treatment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.