ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2026
Genetic underpinnings of YMRS and MADRS scores variations in a bipolar sample.
Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bipolar disorder (BPD) affects approximately 2% of the global population. Its clinical course is highly variable and current treatments are not always effective for all patients. Genetic factors play a significant role in BPD and its treatment, although the genetic background appear to be highly heterogeneous. Polygenic risk scores (PRS) are a powerful tool for risk assessment, yet using all genomic data may introduce confounding factors. Focusing on specific genetic clusters PRS (gcPRS) may mitigate this issue. This study aims to assess a neural network model's efficacy in predicting response to treatment (RtT) in BPD individuals using PRS calculated from specific gcPRS and other variables. 1538 individuals from STEP-BD (age 41.39 ± 12.66, 59.17% female) were analyzed. gcPRS were calculated from a Genome-wide association study (GWAS) with clinical covariates and a molecular pathway analysis (MPA) based on drugs interaction networks. A neural network was trained using gcPRS and clinical variables to predict RtT. Ten biological networks were identified through MPA, with gcPRS derived from risk variants within corresponding gene groups. However, the model did not show significant accuracy in predicting RtT in BPD individuals. RtT in BPD is influenced by multiple factors. This study attempted a comprehensive approach integrating clinical and biological data to predict RtT. However, the model did not achieve significant accuracy, possibly due to limitations such as sample size, disorder complexity, and population heterogeneity. This data highlights the challenge of developing personalized treatments for BPD and the necessity for further research in this area.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39313733What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.