Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313589›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2025

Where the 'bad' and the 'good' go: A multi-lab direct replication report of Casasanto (2009, Experiment 1).

Yuki Yamada, Jin Xue, Panpan Li, Susana Ruiz-Fernández, Asil Ali Özdoğru, Şahsenem Sarı, Sergio C Torres, José A Hinojosa, Pedro R Montoro, Bedoor AlShebli and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Exploring Body-Specific Associations in Swipe Gestures: A Study on Hand Dominance and Emotional Valence.International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Yuki YamadaFaculty of Arts and Science, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan. yamadayuk@gmail.com.
Jin XueSchool of Foreign Languages, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, China.
Panpan LiSchool of Foreign Studies, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing, China.
Susana Ruiz-FernándezBTU Brandenburg University of Technology, Cottbus-Senftenberg, Germany.
Asil Ali ÖzdoğruDepartment of Psychology, Marmara University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Şahsenem SarıDepartment of Psychology, Üsküdar University, Istanbul, Türkiye.
Sergio C TorresMultimodal Interaction Lab, Leibniz Institut für Wissensmedien, Tübingen, Germany.
José A HinojosaInstituto Pluridisciplinar, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Pedro R MontoroDepartamento de Psicología Básica 1, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Bedoor AlShebliSocial Science Division, New York University Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.
Aidos K BolatovSchool of Medicine, Astana Medical University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Grant J McGeechanCentre for Applied Psychological Sciences, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, UK.
Mircea ZloteanuDepartment of Criminology, Politics, and Sociology, Kingston University London, London, UK.
Irene Razpurker-ApfeldDepartment of Behavioral Sciences, Zefat Academic College, Safed, Israel.
Adil SamekinM. Narikbayev KAZGUU University, Astana, Kazakhstan.
Nurit Tal-OrDepartment of Communication, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel.
Julian TejadaDepartment of Psychology, Federal University of Sergipe, São Christóvão, Brazil.
Raquel FreitagDepartment of Letters, Federal University of Sergipe, São Christóvão, Brazil.
Omid Khatin-ZadehSchool of Foreign Languages, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu, China.
Hassan BanarueeUniversity of Education Weingarten, Weingarten, Germany.
Nicolas RobinFaculty of Sport Sciences, Université des Antilles, Pointe-à-Pitre, France.
Guillermo Briseño-SanchezDepartment of Statistics, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, Germany.
Carlos J Barrera-CausilFacultad de Ciencias Exactas y Aplicadas, Instituto Tecnológico Metropolitano, Medellín, Colombia.
Fernando Marmolejo-RamosUniversity of South Australia Online, Adelaide, Australia.

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP18K12015Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP20H04581Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP21H03784Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP22K18263Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP24K21501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Casasanto (Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 351-367, 2009) conceptualised the body-specificity hypothesis by empirically finding that right-handed people tend to associate a positive valence with the right side and a negative valence with the left side, whilst left-handed people tend to associate a positive valence with the left side and negative valence with the right side. Thus, this was the first paper that showed a body-specific space-valence mapping. These highly influential findings led to a substantial body of research and follow-up studies, which could confirm the original findings on a conceptual level. However, direct replications of the original study are scarce. Against this backdrop and given the replication crisis in psychology, we conducted a direct replication of Casasanto's original study with 2,222 participants from 12 countries to examine the aforementioned effects in general and also in a cross-cultural comparison. Our results support Casasanto's findings that right-handed people associate the right side with positivity and the left side with negativity and vice versa for left-handers.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonFunctional LateralitySpace PerceptionAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultBig team scienceBody-specificity hypothesisConceptual mappingEmbodied cognitionHandednessSocial cognitionSpace–valence association

Identifiers

PMID39313589
PMCPMC12141115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.