Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313582›Full record

ArticleSurgical endoscopy2024

The current role of barbed sutures in fascial closure of ventral hernia repair: a multicenter study using the abdominal core health quality collaborative database.

Luis Arias-Espinosa, Annie Wang, Joao Pedro Wermelinger, Molly A Olson, Sharon Phillips, Weipeng Xie, Xavier de Pena Pena, Xavier Pereira, Tanuja Damani, Flavio Malcher

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Surgical endoscopy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luis Arias-EspinosaDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA. luisariasespinosa@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-5983-6687
Annie WangDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1024-9294
Joao Pedro WermelingerDivision of General Surgery, Hospital Municipal Miguel Couto, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID 0009-0002-8855-5950
Molly A OlsonDepartment of Population Health, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9809-0240
Sharon PhillipsDepartment of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4230-4454
Weipeng XieDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0027-2992
Xavier de Pena PenaDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8441-4945
Xavier PereiraDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6247-7523
Tanuja DamaniDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1699-6370
Flavio MalcherDivision of General Surgery, New York University Langone Health, 530 1th Ave, New York, NY, 10016, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1644-9921

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBarbed sutures (BS) have been increasingly used in the last two decades across surgical disciplines but little is known about how widespread their adoption has been in ventral hernia repair (VHR). The aim of this study was to document the use of barbed sutures in VHR in a multicenter database with associated clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

methodProspectively collected data from the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database was retrospectively reviewed, including all adult patients who underwent VHR with fascial closure from 2020 to 2022. A univariate analysis compared patients with BS against non-barbed sutures (NBS) across the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative timeframes including patient-reported outcomes concerning quality of life and pain scores.

resultsA total of 4054 patients that underwent ventral hernia repair with BS were compared with 6473 patients with non-barbed sutures (NBS). Overall, BS were used in 86.2% of minimally invasive ventral hernia repairs and about 92.2% of robotic surgery compared to only 9.6% of open procedures. Notable differences existed in patient selection, including a higher BMI (32 vs 30.5; p < 0.001), more incisional hernias (63.3% vs 51.1%; p < 0.001), wider hernias (4 cm vs 3 cm; p < 0.001), and higher ASA score (p < 0.001) in patients with BS. Outcomes in patients with BS included a shorter length of stay (mean days; 1.4 vs 2.4; p < 0.001), less SSI (1.5% vs 3.6%; p < 0.001), while having similar SSO (7.6% vs 7.3%; p = 0.657), readmission (3.0 vs 3.2; p = 0.691), and reoperation (1.5% vs 1.45%; p = 0.855), at a longer operative time (p < 0.001). Hernia-specific questionnaires for quality of life (HerQLes) and pain in patients with BS had a worse preoperative score that was later matched and favorable compared to NBS (p = 0.048). PRO concerning hernia recurrence suggest around 10% at two years of follow-up (p = 0.532).

conclusionUse of barbed sutures in VHR is widespread and highly related to MIS. Outcomes from this multicenter database cannot be reported as superior but suggest that barbed sutures do not have a negative impact on outcomes.

Indexed as

Hernia, VentralHerniorrhaphySuturesSuture TechniquesAdultAgedDatabases, FactualFasciotomyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresQuality of LifeRetrospective StudiesACHQCBarbed sutureHerQLesPatient-reported outcomesRobotic ventral hernia repair

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.