Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313517›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

A deep learning method for simultaneous denoising and missing wedge reconstruction in cryogenic electron tomography.

Simon Wiedemann, Reinhard Heckel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. CoCryoViS: Collaborative online cryo-electron tomography visualization system.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. RBMP2 shapes specialized membranes for CObioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. ICECREAM: high-fidelity equivariant cryo-electron tomography.Acta crystallographica. Section D, Structural biology · 2026
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Research square · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  17. Dimeric gold nanoparticles enable multiplexed labeling in cryoelectron tomography.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Simon WiedemannDepartment of Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Reinhard HeckelDepartment of Computer Engineering, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. reinhard.heckel@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2874-2984

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cryogenic electron tomography is a technique for imaging biological samples in 3D. A microscope collects a series of 2D projections of the sample, and the goal is to reconstruct the 3D density of the sample called the tomogram. Reconstruction is difficult as the 2D projections are noisy and can not be recorded from all directions, resulting in a missing wedge of information. Tomograms conventionally reconstructed with filtered back-projection suffer from noise and strong artefacts due to the missing wedge. Here, we propose a deep-learning approach for simultaneous denoising and missing wedge reconstruction called DeepDeWedge. The algorithm requires no ground truth data and is based on fitting a neural network to the 2D projections using a self-supervised loss. DeepDeWedge is simpler than current state-of-the-art approaches for denoising and missing wedge reconstruction, performs competitively and produces more denoised tomograms with higher overall contrast.

Identifiers

PMID39313517
PMCPMC11420219

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.