Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313501›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Female sex bias in Iberian megalithic societies through bioarchaeology, aDNA and proteomics.

Marta Díaz-Zorita Bonilla, Gonzalo Aranda Jiménez, Margarita Sánchez Romero, Rosa Fregel, Katharina Rebay-Salisbury, Fabian Kanz, Miriam Vílchez Suárez, Sonia Robles Carrasco, Paula Becerra Fuello, Alejandra C Ordónez and 3 more

Erratum issuedAbstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Marta Díaz-Zorita BonillaInstitute for Pre- and Protohistory and Medieval Archaeology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany. marta.diaz-zorita-bonilla@uni-tuebingen.de.
Gonzalo Aranda JiménezDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Margarita Sánchez RomeroDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Rosa FregelDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Cell Biology and Genetics, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Katharina Rebay-SalisburyDepartment of Prehistoric and Historical Archaeology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Fabian KanzCenter for Forensic Medicine, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Miriam Vílchez SuárezDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sonia Robles CarrascoDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Paula Becerra FuelloDepartment of Prehistory and Archaeology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Alejandra C OrdónezDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Cell Biology and Genetics, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Michael WolfDepartment of Analytical Chemistry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Javier González SerranoDepartment of Biochemistry, Microbiology, Cell Biology and Genetics, Universidad de La Laguna, San Cristóbal de La Laguna, Spain.
Lara Milesi GarcíaDepartment of Historical Sciences, University of Malaga, Malaga, Spain.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF TAI 759FEDER-programme B-HUM-174-UGR20 and PGC2018-094101-A-I00Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación PID2020-114282GB-I00 and PID2021-123080NB-I00Regional Government of Andalusia P18-FR-4123
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uncertainties regarding traditional osteological methods in biological sex estimation can often be overcome with genomic and proteomic analyses. The combination of the three methodologies has been used for a better understanding of the gender-related funerary rituals at the Iberian megalithic cemetery of Panoría. As a result, 44 individuals have been sexed including, for the first time, non-adults. Contrary to the male bias found in many Iberian and European megalithic monuments, the Panoría population shows a clear sex ratio imbalance in favour of females, with twice as many females as males. Furthermore, this imbalance is found regardless of the criterion considered: sex ratio by tomb, chronological period, method of sex estimation, or age group. Biological relatedness was considered as possible sociocultural explanations for this female-related bias. However, the current results obtained for Panoría are indicative of a female-centred social structure potentially influencing rites and cultural traditions.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyProteomicsDNA, AncientFemaleHistory, AncientHumansMaleSexismSpainDNA, AncientAmelogenin peptideFunerary ritualGender archaeologyHuman osteologyIberian PeninsulaMegalithismMolecular sex

Identifiers

PMID39313501
PMCPMC11420231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.