ArticleMagnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine2025
The Utility of Apparent Water Diffusion Coefficient Maps for Evaluating the Presence of Myometrial Invasion in Patients with Endometrial Cancer.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo assess the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient maps (ADC) for diagnosing myometrial invasion (MI) in endometrial cancer (EC).
methodsThis retrospective study included 164 patients (mean age, 56 years; range, 25-89 years) who underwent preoperative MRI for EC with <1/2 MI or no MI between April 2016 and July 2023. Five sequences were evaluated: T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), ADC, dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (DCE-T1WI), and contrast-enhanced T1WI (CE-T1WI). Three experienced radiologists independently assessed the sequences for MI. For ADC, MI was determined if the endometrial-myometrial junction-tumor boundary had disappeared. Additionally, the assessment of MI was performed using the combination of T2WI, DWI, and ADC, as well as T2WI, DCE-T1WI, and CE-T1WI. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the presence of MI were calculated and compared between the sequences and combinations. Inter-reader agreement was assessed using kappa (κ) statistics.
resultsThe sensitivity of ADC was significantly higher than T2WI (P < 0.001) and DCE-T1WI (P = 0.018) for one reader and significantly higher than CE-T1WI (P = 0.045 and 0.043) for two readers. The specificity of ADC was significantly lower than T2WI (P = 0.015 and < 0.001) and CE-T1WI (P = 0.031 and 0.01) for two readers and significantly lower than DCE-T1WI (P = 0.031) for one reader. The AUC of ADC was significantly higher than T2WI (P = 0.048) and DCE-T1WI (P = 0.049) for one reader. The combination including ADC showed higher positive predictive value for all three readers compared to any sequence or combination including contrast enhancement. Additionally, ADC demonstrated the highest agreement rates.
conclusionADC had high sensitivity for MI and the highest agreement rate among all sequences. Thus, this sequence, combined with other sequences, can be crucial for a comprehensive evaluation of MI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.