SynthesisEndocrine journal2025
Association between non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.
Synthesis in Endocrine journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lipid biomarkers for the prediction of type 2 diabetes risk, an umbrella review and updated meta-analyses of prospective observational studies.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Pooled it
- Observational
- Microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes with or without MASLD: the EPSOMIP study, a primary care cohort study.BMC primary care · 2025Observational
- Association of remnant cholesterol with depression, type 2 diabetes, and their coexistence.BMC psychiatry · 2025Article
- Association of Changes in Relevant Indicators With Cardiovascular Disease and Osteoporosis in Perimenopausal and Postmenopausal Women.Food science & nutrition · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL), a more readily available and reliable lipid parameter, is unclear in its association with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Previous studies assessing the relationship between non-HDL and T2D risk remains inconsistent results. We performed a meta-analysis to systematically evaluate this association. The PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched to find articles on "non-HDL" and "T2D" from inception to December 6, 2023. A random-effects model was used to calculate the effect estimates and 95% confidence intervals. Subgroup analyses and univariate Meta-regression were performed to explore sources of heterogeneity. The main exposure and outcome were non-HDL and T2D, respectively, in the general population. A total of 8 studies included 251,672 participants who met the inclusion criteria for this study. Meta-analysis showed that higher non-HDL increased the risk of T2D compared with the lower non-HDL group (total effect size: 1.16; 95% CI 1.079-1.251, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses and Meta-regression of the association between non-HDL and T2D were not affected by region, proportion of men, sample size, or adjustment for confounders (including BMI, hypertension, waist circumference, and family history of diabetes). Higher non-HDL may be associated with an increased risk of T2D. Large prospective cohort studies are needed to validate these findings, and further studies are required in order to elucidate the underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms underlying the association between non-HDL and T2D.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.