ArticleBMJ open ophthalmology2024
Comparing 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curve between newly diagnosed ocular hypertension and primary open-angle glaucoma.
Article in BMJ open ophthalmology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Adrenergic Pathways Mediate Circadian IOP Rhythm in Rats.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2026Article
- Symptomatic intraocular pressure dysregulation during clopidogrel exposure after patent foramen ovale closure in a patient with ocular hypertension and angle crowding: a Case Report.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo compare the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation slope curve between newly diagnosed patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Newly diagnosed and untreated OHT and POAG patients who underwent 24-hour IOP monitoring were consecutively enrolled in the study. IOP measurements were taken every 2 hours from 8:00 to 6:00 hours the following day using an iCare PRO tonometer. Patients maintained their daily routines, with IOP measured in a seated position during the day and supine at night. The 24-hour IOP fluctuation indices, including peak, trough and overall fluctuation, were calculated. Differences in the 24-hour IOP fluctuation slope curves over time between groups were analysed using a generalised additive mixed model.
results46 patients with OHT and 41 with POAG were included. From 2:00 to 10:00 hours, mean IOP increased by 0.69 mm Hg every 2 hours in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.40 mm Hg in the OHT group (p<0.0001). After 10:00, the IOP showed a downward trend, decreasing by 0.31 mm Hg in the POAG group (p<0.0001) and by 0.17 mm Hg in the OHT group (p=0.0003) every 2 hours. The rate of slope change in the upward phase differed significantly between the groups (0.30 mm Hg per 2 hours; p=0.02), as did the rate in the downward phase (0.14 mm Hg per 2 hours; p for interaction=0.04). Multivariate models showed that each 1 mm Hg increase in circadian and diurnal IOP fluctuation was associated with a 27% and 21% higher likelihood of POAG presence, respectively.
conclusionThe 24-hour IOP slope curve differed between POAG and OHT, with a steeper slope observed in the POAG group. However, the study is limited by potential confounding factors, reliance on a single 24-hour measurement period and the need for further longitudinal studies to validate these findings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.