Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39313212›Full record

ArticleJournal of applied biomechanics2024

Effects of Stroboscopic Goggles on Standing Balance in the Spatiotemporal and Frequency Domains: An Exploratory Study.

Madeleine E McCreary, Chloe M Lapish, Nora M Lewis, Ryland D Swearinger, Daniel P Ferris, Erika M Pliner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of applied biomechanics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeleine E McCrearyDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-3382-4018
Chloe M LapishDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Nora M LewisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Ryland D SwearingerBrain Rehabilitation Research Center, Malcom Randall VA Medical Center, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Daniel P FerrisDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6373-6021
Erika M PlinerDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0713-5675

Funding

Translational Research Training on Aging and Mobility (TRAM)T32AG062728 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI Todd Manini · 2020 to 2026
$2.0M
Efficacy of balance training with intermittent sensory perturbationsF32AG072808 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA · PI PLINER, ERIKA M · 2021 to 2023
$145k
NIA NIH HHS F32 AG072808NIA NIH HHS T32 AG062728
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Balance training paradigms have been shown to effectively reduce fall risk. Visual feedback is an important sensory mechanism for regulating postural control, promoting visual perturbations for balance training paradigms. Stroboscopic goggles, which oscillate from transparent to opaque, are a form of visual perturbation, but their effect on standing balance has not been assessed. In this study, 29 participants stood in bilateral and tandem stances as the center of pressure was recorded for 6 consecutive minutes wherein there were no stroboscopic perturbations in the first and last minutes. Spatial-temporal, frequency domain, and nonlinear standing balance parameters were calculated for each period. More differences in spatial-temporal parameters due to the strobe were found in the medial-lateral direction than the anterior-posterior direction. More differences in frequency domain parameters were observed in the anterior-posterior direction than the medial-lateral direction, but this did not occur for each variable. The nonlinear parameters were strongly affected by the strobe. Stroboscopic perturbations did not affect the bilateral and tandem stances equally. Spatial-temporal parameters for the tandem stance were greater in magnitude during the strobe period than the no strobe periods. This effect was not seen with the bilateral stance. This indicates that the efficacy of stroboscopic perturbations for challenging standing balance depends on task difficulty. Balance training paradigms that utilize stroboscopic perturbations will need to harmonize these perturbations with task difficulty.

Indexed as

Postural BalanceStroboscopyAdultFeedback, SensoryFemaleHumansMaleStanding PositionYoung Adultcenter of pressurefall preventionvisual perturbations

Identifiers

PMID39313212
PMCPMC12231072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.