Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312781›Full record

ArticleNorth Carolina medical journal2023

A Prospective Study of Injection Drug Use and Jail Readmission in Two Western North Carolina Counties.

Hartlee Johnston, Albert M Kopak

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in North Carolina medical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hartlee JohnstonSchool of Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Albert M KopakResearch Department, Mountain Area Health Education Center.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Injection drug use among people admitted to rural jails has significant implications for both infectious disease transmission and incarceration patterns. This study examines the relationship between injection drug use, jail readmission, and detention duration to inform interventions designed specifically for this understudied correctional setting. Methods: The Comprehensive Addiction and Psychological Evaluation-5 (CAAPE-5) was administered to a random sample of adults admitted to two county detention centers in Western North Carolina. Data regarding readmission and the length of detention were obtained for the 12-month study period. Results: Participants included 420 adults, aged 18-66 years. Nearly three-quarters (70.9%) met criteria for at least one substance use disorder (SUD) and almost half (45.7%) met criteria for multiple SUDs. Approximately half (45.2%) reported injecting drugs, with the majority (71.6%) reporting injecting methamphetamine, followed by 51.1% who injected opioids. People who injected drugs were 1.83 times more likely (95% CI = 1.17-2.87) than those who did not inject to be admitted on multiple occasions and also spent a significantly longer amount of time detained (IRR = 1.34, 95% CI = 1.02-1.77) during the 12-month follow-up period. Limitations: The study was limited to jails in two counties and injection-related factors may vary from other facilities. Conclusions: The association between drug injection and longer detention periods presents an opportunity to engage people with infectious disease screening and substance use services in jails. Connection to stable primary and behavioral health care after release is a high priority in enhancing community health.

Indexed as

Patient ReadmissionSubstance Abuse, IntravenousAdolescentAdultAgedFemaleHumansJailsMaleMiddle AgedNorth CarolinaPrisonersProspective StudiesRural PopulationYoung AdultaddictionAlbert M. Kopakincarcerationinjection drug usejail readmissionMAHECnorth carolinaresearchsubstance useUNC

Identifiers

PMID39312781
PMCPMC13368166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.