Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312731›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53

Accessibility and Utility of an Electronic Self-Guided Safety Plan for Adolescents.

Nehal Methi, Imani Weeks, Rowan Hunt, Taylor C McGuire, Alex Rubin, Madlin Decker, Jessica L Schleider, Shirley B Wang, Kathryn Fox

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical child and adolescent psychology : the official journal for the Society of Clinical Child and Adolescent Psychology, American Psychological Association, Division 53. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Reducing the 'Silence Between Sessions': A Qualitative Study on Youth and Professionals' Perspectives on Digital Tools for Suicide Prevention.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nehal MethiDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver.
Imani WeeksDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Rowan HuntDepartment of Psychology, University of Louisville.
Taylor C McGuireDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University.
Alex RubinDepartment of Psychology, Yale University.
Madlin DeckerDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver.
Jessica L SchleiderMedical Social Sciences, Northwestern University.ORCID 0000-0003-2426-1953
Shirley B WangDepartment of Psychology, Yale University.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-3014
Kathryn FoxDepartment of Psychology, University of Denver.ORCID 0000-0002-2697-7771

Funding

Testing Scalable, Single-Session Interventions for Adolescent Depression in the context of COVID-19DP5OD028123 · OD · STATE UNIVERSITY NEW YORK STONY BROOK · PI SCHLEIDER, JESSICA LEE · 2019 to 2023
$2.8M
Mathematical and computational modeling of suicidal thoughts and behaviorsF31MH125495 · NIMH · HARVARD UNIVERSITY · PI WANG, SHIRLEY B · 2021 to 2022
$70k
NIH HHS DP5 OD028123NIMH NIH HHS F31 MH125495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveSuicidal thoughts and behaviors are a leading cause of death, injury, and hospitalization among adolescents. Few evidence-based interventions exist, and these tend to be inaccessible for most youth. Electronic safety plan interventions represent a new avenue to disseminate an evidence-based suicide prevention tool. However, it is not clear whether youth find electronic, self-guided safety plans helpful, nor whether they will use the resulting safety card when experiencing suicidal thoughts or urges. This study examines adolescents' perceptions and use of an electronic, self-guided safety plan intervention.

methodWe recruited 322 adolescents with a past-year history of suicidal thoughts or behaviors, ages 13-17 (55.9% white and non-Hispanic; majority reporting diverse sexual orientations and genders) online via social media to participate in this two-part longitudinal study. At baseline, participants completed the electronic safety plan interventions and reported on key aspects of its usefulness and areas of improvement. Participants reported their use and perceptions of the plan one month later.

resultsResults suggested that adolescents understood, liked, and believed they would use a self-guided safety plan. One month later, about ⅓ of youth who experienced suicidal thoughts or urges used their safety card. Open-ended responses highlighted several features that adolescents enjoyed, including clarity, ease of use, and privacy. Participants also highlighted key areas for improvement, including formatting and language.

conclusionThis study provides initial support for adolescent use of electronic self-guided safety plans. Next steps include updating this intervention based on youth feedback and testing the effectiveness of this tool using gold standard research methods.

Indexed as

Suicidal IdeationAdolescentAdolescent BehaviorFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleSuicide Prevention

Identifiers

PMID39312731
PMCPMC11587818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.