ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
A self-training interpretable cell type annotation framework using specific marker gene.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
- Leveraging AI for cell biology discovery.Biochemical Society transactions · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationRecent advances in sequencing technology provide opportunities to study biological processes at a higher resolution. Cell type annotation is an important step in scRNA-seq analysis, which often relies on established marker genes. However, most of the previous methods divide the identification of cell types into two stages, clustering and assignment, whose performances are susceptible to the clustering algorithm, and the marker information cannot effectively guide the clustering process. Furthermore, their linear heuristic-based cell assignment process is often insufficient to capture potential dependencies between cells and types.
resultsHere, we present Interpretable Cell Type Annotation based on self-training (sICTA), a marker-based cell type annotation method that combines the self-training strategy with pseudo-labeling and the nonlinear association capturing capability of Transformer. In addition, we incorporate biological priori knowledge of genes and pathways into the classifier through an attention mechanism to enhance the transparency of the model. A benchmark analysis on 11 publicly available single-cell datasets demonstrates the superiority of sICTA compared to state-of-the-art methods. The robustness of our method is further validated by evaluating the prediction accuracy of the model on different cell types for each single-cell data. Moreover, ablation studies show that self-training and the ability to capture potential dependencies between cells and cell types, both of which are mutually reinforcing, work together to improve model performance. Finally, we apply sICTA to the pancreatic dataset, exemplifying the interpretable attention matrix captured by sICTA. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: The source code of sICTA is available in public at https://github.com/nbnbhwyy/sICTA. The processed datasets can be found at https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1jbqSxacL_IDIZ4uPjq220C9Kv024m9eL. The final version of the model will be permanently available at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13474010.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.