Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312564›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Stakeholders' perspectives on capturing societal cost savings from a quality improvement initiative: A qualitative study.

Daniëlle Kroon, Simone A van Dulmen, Niek W Stadhouders, Jonas Rosenstok, Baukje van den Heuvel, Gert P Westert, Rudolf B Kool, Patrick P T Jeurissen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Daniëlle KroonDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-6602-5492
Simone A van DulmenDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Niek W StadhoudersDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Jonas RosenstokDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Baukje van den HeuvelDepartment of Operating Rooms, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Gert P WestertDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Rudolf B KoolDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Patrick P T JeurissenDepartment of IQ Health, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBesides improving the quality of care, quality improvement initiatives often also intend to produce cost savings. An example is prehabilitation, which can reduce complication rates and the length of stay in the hospital. However, the process from utilization reductions to actual societal cost savings remains uncertain in practice. Our aim was to identify barriers and facilitators throughout this process. We used the implementation of prehabilitation in a Dutch hospital as a test case.

methodsWe held 20 semi-structured interviews between June and November 2023. Eighteen stakeholders were affiliated with the hospital and two with different health insurers. Nine interviews were held face-to-face and 11 via Microsoft Teams. The interviews were recorded and transcribed. The first transcripts were inductively coded by two authors, the subsequent transcripts by one and checked by another. Differences were resolved through discussion.

resultsWe identified 20 barriers and 23 facilitators across four stages: reducing capacity, reducing departmental expenses, reducing hospital expenses and reducing insurer expenses. All participants expected that the excess capacity will be used for other priorities. This was perceived as highly valuable and as an efficiency gain. Other barriers to capture savings included the fear of losing resilience, flexibility, status and revenue. Misalignment between service contracts among hospitals and insurers can hinder the ability to financially incentivize cost reductions. Additionally, some contract types can hinder the transfer of hospital savings to insurers. Identified facilitators included shared savings agreements, an explicit strategy targeting all stages, and labor shortage, among others.

conclusionThis study systematically describes barriers and facilitators that prevent translating quality improvement initiatives into societal cost savings. Stakeholders expect that any saved capacity will be used for other priorities, including providing care due to the increasing demand. Capturing any cash savings does not occur automatically, emphasizing the need for a strategy targeting all stages.

Indexed as

Cost SavingsQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementHospitalsHumansNetherlandsStakeholder Participation

Identifiers

PMID39312564
PMCPMC11419338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.