Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312503›Full record

ArticleEating disorders

The experience of treatment for eating disorders as told by content creators on TikTok.

Meredith R Kells, Heather A Davis, Chloe Roske, Sam Holzman, Jennifer E Wildes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Eating disorders. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meredith R KellsDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9982-9964
Heather A DavisDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Chloe RoskeDepartment of Psychology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Sam HolzmanAlbert Einstein College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Bronx, New York, USA.
Jennifer E WildesDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA.

Funding

Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

TikTok, a social media platform with substantial youth engagement, has been used to examine eating disorder (ED) recovery; however, no studies have described the experience of ED treatment as told on TikTok. The purpose of this study was to describe content related to ED treatment using the hashtag #EDtreatment. The 100 most-viewed videos using #EDtreatment were downloaded, transcribed verbatim, and coded. Using qualitative thematic analysis, a coding framework was created; themes were generated and reviewed by coauthors until consensus was reached. Ultimately, 55 videos were included in the analysis. The videos included in the analysis had, in total, 15.6 million views, 3 million "likes", 36647 comments, and were shared by users 26,673 times. Themes generated included Aspects of Treatment, Interpersonal Relationships, Emotions and Psychiatric Comorbidities, and ED Experiences. Content ranged from uplifting and encouraging to negative and serious. Videos used dramatic reenactments, music, humor, and other entertainment methods, suggesting that creators attempted to generate high volume viewer consumption. When combined with TikTok's brief video format, users may consume large amounts of content rapidly. Individuals considering treatment may be influenced by viewing TikTok content. When clinically engaging individuals with EDs, the perceived significance of this content is a topic of consideration.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansInterpersonal RelationsMaleQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID39312503
PMCPMC12969844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.