Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312234›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2024

Role of Hospital Connectedness in Brain Metastasis Outcomes.

Lilin Tong, Ruchit V Patel, Ayal A Aizer, Amar Dhand, Wenya Linda Bi

Erratum issuedAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Error in Figure.JAMA network open · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lilin TongDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ruchit V PatelDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Ayal A AizerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Amar DhandDepartment of Neurology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Wenya Linda BiDepartment of Neurosurgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Although patients with brain metastases receive interdisciplinary and multi-institutional care, the association between neuro-oncologic care networks and patient outcomes remains unknown. As patients often interact with multiple facilities, quantifying this association across a network of hospitals is critical to capture the complexity of the health care journey for patients with brain metastases. Objective: To evaluate how statewide health care network metrics are associated with inpatient mortality and hospital length of stay (LOS) for patients with brain metastases. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, statewide cohort study used data from the 2018 to 2019 Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project State Inpatient and Emergency Department Databases. Primary analyses were completed by August 2023. Participants included adults with a brain metastases receiving care in Massachusetts. Exposure: All inpatient and emergency department visits mapped for patients following the first diagnosis of brain metastasis. Main Outcomes and Measures: Inpatient mortality and hospital LOS were the main outcomes assessed. Hospital interdependence in brain metastases care was calculated using a connectedness score (weighted degree: weighted sum of ties to other care facilities). The association between hospital connectedness and clinical outcomes was analyzed using mixed-effects logistic and linear regression models, adjusting for hospital-level features. Results: In this cohort study, 4679 patients with brain metastases were identified with inpatient or ED encounters in Massachusetts (from 2018 to 2019). The median (IQR) age was 64 (57-73) years, and 2559 (55%) were female. There was interdependence in brain metastases care, with 993 patients (21%) visiting 2 or more unique hospitals. Highly connected hospitals were heterogeneous, with many being small and one-half lacking subspecialty neuro-oncologic care or teaching status. Increased hospital connectedness was significantly associated with improved inpatient mortality for patients with brain metastases, with the lowest connectedness quartile associated with more than double the risk of mortality compared with the highest quartile (odds ratio, 2.34; 95% CI, 1.33-4.11; P = .003). A stepwise increase in inpatient mortality risk was observed as hospital connectedness decreased, independently of hospital volume. Furthermore, intermediate hospital connectedness was associated with increased hospital LOS (coefficient, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.17-1.95; P = .006). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that hospital-to-hospital interconnectedness was significantly associated with improved clinical outcomes for patients with brain metastases. The salience of network metrics highlights their potential role alongside other patient-level and hospital-level variables to evaluate and improve oncology care delivery.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsHospital MortalityLength of StayAdultAgedCohort StudiesFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

PMID39312234
PMCPMC11420690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.