ArticleMethods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.)2025
Applicability Domain for Trustable Predictions.
Article in Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The predictive value of multiple artificial intelligence models in axillary lymph node metastasis of breast cancer detected by ultrasound - a network meta-analysis.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Pooled it
- Explicit Applicability Domain Calculations Can Help Determine When Uncertainty Estimates Are Less Reliable.ACS omega · 2026Article
- KidneyTox_v1.0 enables explainable artificial intelligence prediction of nephrotoxicity in small molecules.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Relative Fat Mass and Physical Indices as Predictors of Gallstone Formation: Insights From Machine Learning and Logistic Regression.International journal of general medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In the rapidly evolving landscape of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), understanding and correctly applying the concept of the applicability domain (AD) has emerged as an essential part. This chapter begins with an introduction and background on the critical area of AD. It dives into the definition and different methodologies associated with the applicability domain, laying a solid foundation for further exploration. A detailed examination of AD's role within the framework of AI and ML is undertaken, supported by in-depth theoretical foundations. The paper then proceeds to delineate the various measures of AD in AI and ML, offering insights into methods like DA index (κ, γ, δ), class probability estimation, and techniques involving local vicinity, boosting, classification neural networks, and subgroup discovery (SGD), among others. We also discussed a series of AD methods employed in Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) studies. Lastly, the diverse applications of AD are addressed, underlining its widespread influence across different sectors. This chapter is intended to offer a thorough understanding of AD and its applications, particularly in AI and ML, leading to more informed research and decision-making in these fields as a good amount of literature already exists regarding AD of QSAR modeling.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39312163What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.