Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312128›Full record

ArticleAging clinical and experimental research2024

Which stakeholders should be addressed to promote Geriatric Medicine among healthcare professionals, educationalists and policy-makers in European countries? - the PROGRAMMING COST 21,122 action experience.

Sumru Savas, Nilufer Demiral Yilmaz, Marina Kotsani, Karolina Piotrowicz, Sofia Duque

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aging clinical and experimental research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Time for Gen Z doctors to care for older patients.European geriatric medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sumru SavasDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Geriatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4836-3786
Nilufer Demiral YilmazDepartment of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Ege University, Izmir, Turkey. nilufer.demiral@ege.edu.tr.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1305-3035
Marina KotsaniHellenic Society for the Study and Research of Ageing, Agia Paraskevi, Greece.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4696-0026
Karolina Piotrowicz *Department of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Faculty of Medicine, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-8588
Sofia Duque *Preventive Medicine and Public Health Institute, Faculty of Medicine, University of Lisbon, Hospital Cuf Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-5650

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGeriatric Medicine (GM), concerned with well-being and health of older adults, can play a crucial role in the alignment of healthcare systems to the needs of the aged populations. However, countries have varying GM development backgrounds. The goal of PROGRAMMING- COST 21,122 Action is to propose the content of education and training activities in GM for healthcare professionals across various clinical settings, adapted to local context, needs, and assets. Defining relevant stakeholders and addressing them on both an international as well as a country-specific level is crucial for this purpose. In this paper we are describing the methods used in the PROGRAMMING Action 21,122 to map the different categories of stakeholders to be engaged in the Action.

methodsThrough conceptualizing a model for stakeholders by literature research, and online discussion group meetings, a synthesis for the potential stakeholders was defined as a template, and pilot applications were requested from participant countries.

resultsThere were 24 members from 14 countries (6 males/18 females) of multidisciplinary professions involved in this study. A model for the list of stakeholders to be addressed was developed and, after seven online discussion meetings, a consensus framework was provided. Invited countries completed the templates to pilot such operationalization.

conclusionOur framework of stakeholders will support the research coordination and capacity-building objectives of PROGRAMMING, including the participation into the assessment of educational needs of healthcare professionals. Identified stakeholders will also be mobilized for purposes of dissemination and maximization of the Action's impact. By defining and mapping multidisciplinary stakeholders involved in older people's care specific to countries, particularly where GM is still emerging, GM tailored educational activities will be facilitated and optimally targeted.

Indexed as

GeriatricsHealth PersonnelAdministrative PersonnelAgedEuropeFemaleHumansMaleStakeholder ParticipationEducationGeriatric medicineHealthcare professionalsStakeholdersTraining

Identifiers

PMID39312128
PMCPMC11420320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.