Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312106›Full record

ArticleClinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society2025

Heart rate variability metrics and myocardial recovery in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Tarun W Dasari, Michiaki Nagai, Hallum Ewbank, Praloy Chakraborty, Sunny S Po

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Hypertension: a missing piece in HFpEF?Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Autonomic effects of simulated periodic breathing in patients with chronic heart failure on contemporary guideline-directed therapy.Clinical autonomic research : official journal of the Clinical Autonomic Research Society · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tarun W DasariCardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Andrews Academic Tower, Suite 5400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. Tarun-Dasari@ouhsc.edu.
Michiaki NagaiCardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Andrews Academic Tower, Suite 5400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA. nagai10m@r6.dion.ne.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3838-1369
Hallum EwbankCardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Andrews Academic Tower, Suite 5400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Praloy ChakrabortyCardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Andrews Academic Tower, Suite 5400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.
Sunny S PoCardiovascular Section, Department of Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Science Center, Andrews Academic Tower, Suite 5400, Oklahoma City, OK, 73104, USA.

Funding

Neuromodulation of inflammation and endothelial function to treat elderly patients with systolic heart failure.R21AG075639 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA HLTH SCIENCES CTR · PI DASARI, TARUN · 2022 to 2023
$397k
NIA NIH HHS R21 AG075639
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeAutonomic dysregulation is observed in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Abnormal heart rate variability (HRV), a measure of such dysregulation, is associated with poor prognosis in HFrEF. It is unknown if novel HRV metrics normalize in the patients with recovered ejection fraction (HFrecEF) compared to persistent HFrEF. The aim of this study was to investigate novel HRV indexes in persistent HFrEF in comparison to HFrecEF

methodsA standard 10-min electrocardiography measurement was performed in patients categorized in four groups: persistent HFrEF (n = 40), HFrecEF (n = 41), stage A HF (n = 73) and healthy controls (n = 40).

resultsAll HRV indexes were significantly different between the four groups. Specifically, novel metrics, such as higher parasympathetic nervous system (PNS) index and lower sympathetic nervous system (SNS) index, were observed in the HFrecEF group compared to the persistent HFrEF group. In multiple logistic regression analysis, higher PNS index (odds ratio [OR] 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-3.49; p = 0.01) and lower SNS index (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52-0.87; p = 0.002) were associated with HFrecEF. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the SNS index had the highest area under the curve (AUC), followed by the PNS index and mean heart rate for the HF phenotype regarding EF recovery (AUC = 0.71, 0.69 and 0.69, respectively).

conclusionMyocardial functional recovery in HFrEF is associated with improved parasympathetic activity and reduced sympathetic activity, as reflected in the PNS and SNS indexes. These novel metrics can be potentially used to aid in identifying recovered versus non-recovered phenotypes in patients with HFrEF.

Indexed as

Heart FailureHeart RateRecovery of FunctionStroke VolumeAgedElectrocardiographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedParasympathetic Nervous SystemAutonomic nervous systemHeart rate variabilityHFrecEFHFrEFParasympatheticSympathetic

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.