Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312077›Full record

ArticleMycopathologia2024

Assessment of LAMPAuris for Rapid Detection of Candida auris in Clinical Specimens.

Mikachi Yamamoto, Mohamed Mahdi Alshahni, Aya Komori, Masakazu Mimaki, Koichi Makimura

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Mycopathologia, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Nucleic Acid Amplification Tests forPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mikachi YamamotoDepartment of Pediatrics, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mohamed Mahdi AlshahniInstitute of Medical Mycology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Aya KomoriInstitute of Medical Mycology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan.
Masakazu MimakiDepartment of Pediatrics, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Koichi MakimuraInstitute of Medical Mycology, Teikyo University, Tokyo, Japan. makimura@med.teikyo-u.ac.jp.

Funding

Research Program on Emerging and Re-emerging Infectious Diseases of the Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development AMED 18fk0108008h0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Candida auris is a pathogenic yeast frequently exhibiting multidrug resistance and thus warrants special attention. The prompt detection and proper identification of this organism are needed to prevent its spread in healthcare facilities. The authors of this paper had previously developed LAMPAuris, a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay, for the specific detection of C. auris. LAMPAuris is evaluated in this report for its ability to identify C. auris from five clades and to detect it from clinical specimens. A total of 103 skin swab samples were tested in comparison with a culture-based method and C. auris-specific SYBR green qPCR. The results show that the LAMPAuris assay had specificities ranging from 97 to 100% and sensitivities ranging from 66 to 86%. The lower sensitivity could be attributed to DNA degradation caused by the prolonged storage of the samples. In conclusion, LAMPAuris proved to be a rapid and reliable method for identifying C. auris and for detecting it in clinical specimens. Fresh specimens should ensure better yield and higher sensitivities.

Indexed as

Candida aurisCandidiasisMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesSensitivity and SpecificityCandidaHumansSkinTime FactorsCandida aurisEnvironmental surveillanceFungal detection methodInfection controlLoop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP)

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.