A comprehensive evaluation and meta-analysis of the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy using the DaVinci vs the Hugo RAS surgical platforms.

Because of the increasing popularity of Hugo RAS as a surgical platform, a comparison examination of intraoperative and oncological outcomes across DaVinci and Hugo RAS robotic surgery platforms is urgently needed. We carried out a comprehensive review and meta-analysis of the literature of current research, comprehensively searching PubMed, Cochrane and Embase for eligible studies comparing the results between the DaVinci and Hugo RAS. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) criteria were followed in the conduct of this study, with language restricted to English and a final search date of June 2024. We excluded articles composed solely of conference abstracts and irrelevant content. Composite outcomes were assessed using weighted mean differences (WMD) and odds ratios (ORs). The risk of bias in individual research was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and heterogeneity and bias risk were controlled for using a sensitivity analysis. Six studies in all were considered, comprising 1025 patients, including 626 DaVinci patients and 399 Hugo RAS patients. Review Manager V5.4.1 software (Cochrane Collaboration, Oxford, UK) was utilized to conduct the meta-analysis, including 6 trials, which demonstrated that compared to Hugo RAS, DaVinci was associated with statistically significant differences in several outcomes: a reduction in operative time (OT) (WMD - 8.46, 95% CI - 13.56 to 3.36; p = 0.001), an increase in estimated blood loss (EBL) (WMD 41.68, 95% CI 23.59 to 59.77; p < 0.00001), and an increased pelvic lymphadenectomy ratio (OR 1.5, 95% CI 1.05-2.05; p = 0.01). On the contrary, there were no statistically noteworthy differences in the length of hospital stay (LOS) between the two teams (WMD - 0.05, 95% CI - 0.14 to 0.04; p = 0.25), nerve sparing (unilateral or bilateral) (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.68-1.35; p = 0.8), postoperative complications (OR 1.15, 95% CI 0.50-2.64; p = 0.75), or positive surgical margins (PSM) (OR 1.08, 95% CI 0.76-1.54; p = 0.68). Although DaVinci offers shorter operating times (OT) and increased pelvic lymph node dissection rates, Hugo RAS demonstrates lower estimated blood loss (EBL). Overall, Hugo RAS Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP) results seem to be similar to those obtained with the DaVinci system. Further research and long-term follow-up are necessary to ascertain durable oncological and functional outcomes, allowing doctors to switch between robotic systems and use their skills. These findings are crucial for patients, surgeons, and healthcare policymakers and warrant future studies with extended follow-up.