Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39312000›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2025

PATH classification: a proposal for patients with HNSCC treated with salvage surgery.

Albert Llansana, David Virós Porcuna, Rosselin Vasquez, Arnau Parellada, Cristina Valero, Anna Holgado, Xavier León

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Albert LlansanaOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Mutua de Terrassa, Universitat Autonoma, Terrassa, Spain.
David Virós PorcunaOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital Vall Hebron Campus, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Passeig Vall d'Hebron, 119-129, Barcelona, 08035, Spain. David.Viros@uab.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2861-3672
Rosselin VasquezOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Arnau ParelladaOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Cristina ValeroOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Anna HolgadoOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier LeónOtorhinolaryngology Department, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this study is to propose a classification for patients with recurrent head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treated with salvage surgery based on the location of the primary tumor and data commonly found in the pathological report of the resection.

methodsRetrospective study of 665 patients with HNSCC treated with a salvage surgery after a local and/or regional recurrence of the tumor.

resultsWe propose a new postoperative classification for patients with recurrent HNSCC treated with salvage surgery. PATH classification stratifies patients into 4 stages based on the glottic or non-glottic location of the primary tumor, the local and regional pathologic extension of the tumor, the status of the surgical margins, and the presence of lymph node metastases with extracapsular spread. The PATH classification was more homogeneous in the prognosis of patients included in each of its stages, and it had a better prognostic discrimination capacity between stages than the rpTNM classification. According to the PATH classification, the 5-year disease-specific survival was: PATH I (n = 306) 82.8%; PATH II (n = 119) 47.1%; PATH III (n = 202) 24.4%; PATH IV (n = 38) 3.7%. For the rpTNM classification, the 5-year disease-specific survival was: stage I (n = 119) 85.1%; stage II (n = 134) 68.4%; stage III (n = 111) 59.5%; stage IV (n = 301) 33.3%.

conclusionThe PATH classification for HNSCC patients with local and/or regional recurrence treated with salvage surgery had a better prognostic capacity than the rpTNM classification. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Squamous CellHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSalvage TherapyAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansLymphatic MetastasisMaleMargins of ExcisionMiddle AgedNeoplasm StagingPrognosisRetrospective StudiesHead and neck cancerPostoperative prognostic classificationRecurrent diseaserpTNMSalvage surgery

Identifiers

PMID39312000
PMCPMC11805818

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.