Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311979›Full record

ArticleTechniques in coloproctology2024

Short-term outcomes of delta-shaped anastomosis versus functional end-to-end anastomosis using linear staplers for colon cancer.

R Ono, T Tominaga, M Ishii, M Hisanaga, M Araki, Y Sumida, T Nonaka, S Hashimoto, T Shiraishi, K Noda and 6 more

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Techniques in coloproctology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

R OnoDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
T TominagaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan. tetsuro.tominaga@nagasaki-u.ac.jp.
M IshiiDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
M HisanagaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
M ArakiDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
Y SumidaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
T NonakaDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
S HashimotoDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
T ShiraishiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Nagasaki University Graduate School of Biomedical Science, 1-7-1 Sakamoto, Nagasaki, 852-8501, Japan.
K NodaDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
H TakeshitaDepartment of Surgery, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, 1-1001-1, Omura, Nagasaki, 856-8562, Japan.
H FukuokaDepartment of Surgery, Isahaya General Hospital, 24-1 Isahaya, Nagasaki, 854-8501, Japan.
S OyamaDepartment of Surgery, Ureshino Medical Center, 4279-3 Ko, Ureshinomachi, Oaza, Shimojuku, Ureshino, Saga, 843-0393, Japan.
K IshimaruDepartment of Surgery, Saiseikai Nagasaki Hospital, 2-5-1 Katafuchi, Nagasaki, 850-0003, Japan.
T SawaiDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.
K MatsumotoDepartment of Surgery, Sasebo City General Hospital, 9-3 Hirasemachi, Nagasaki, 857-8511, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral methods are used for reconstruction in colon cancer surgery, including hand-sewn or stapled anastomosis. However, few reports have compared short-term outcomes among reconstruction methods. This study compared short-term outcomes between delta-shaped anastomosis (Delta) and functional end-to-end anastomosis (FEEA).

methodsWe retrospectively reviewed 1314 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal surgery with FEEA or Delta reconstruction between January 2016 and December 2023. Patients were divided into two groups according to reconstruction by FEEA (F group; n = 1242) or Delta (D group; n = 72). Propensity score matching was applied to minimize the possibility of selection bias and to balance covariates that could affect postoperative complications. Short-term outcomes were compared between groups.

resultsPostoperative complications occurred in 215 patients (17.3%) in F group and 8 patients (11.1%) in D group. Before matching, transverse colon cancer was more frequent (p = 0.002), clinical N-positive status was less frequent (44.1% versus 16.7%, p < 0.001), distant metastasis was less frequent (11.7% versus 1.4%, p = 0.003), and laparoscopic approach was more frequent (87.8% versus 100%, p < 0.001) in D group. After matching, no differences in any clinical factor were evident between groups. Blood loss was significantly lower (28 mL versus 10 mL, p = 0.002) in D group, but operation time and postoperative complication rates were similar between groups.

conclusionsDelta and FEEA were both considered safe as reconstruction methods. Further studies are needed to clarify appropriate case selection for Delta and FEEA.

Indexed as

Anastomosis, SurgicalColonic NeoplasmsPostoperative ComplicationsPropensity ScoreAgedColectomyColonFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedOperative TimeRetrospective StudiesSurgical StaplersSurgical StaplingColon cancerDelta-shaped anastomosisFunctional end-to-end anastomosisPostoperative complication

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.