ReviewPediatric surgery international2024
The long-term post-surgical outcome of intermediate anorectal malformation in our department.
Review in Pediatric surgery international, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPosterior sagittal anorectoplasty and laparoscopic-assisted anorectal pull-through are preferred for anorectal malformation (ARM) today, while careful pull-through procedures with sacroperineal approach yield excellent outcomes. This study focuses on a pull-through procedure emphasizing continence mechanism preservation and compares outcomes with historical studies with various procedures.
methodsBowel function of patients with intermediate ARM followed up for over 10 years post-surgically was assessed. Data collected included ARM type with the Krickenbeck classification, comorbidities, complications, post-surgical examinations, follow-up, and bowel function at the latest clinic visit. The literature review collected original articles including more than 10 post-anorectoplasty cases which were followed for over 10 years.
resultsEleven cases were identified, with a median age at anorectoplasty and follow-up length of 6.9 months and 14.4 years. Two fistula recurrences required surgical treatment. Long-term incontinence and constipation were observed in 9% and 45% of the cohort, respectively. Good rectal angulation and a positive rectoanal inhibitory reflex were confirmed in most cases examined. A literature review identified eight studies with various outcome-measuring instruments.
conclusionOutcomes of the introduced pull-through procedure were favorable, while the literature review highlights the variation in outcomes of various anorectoplasty. EVIDENCE LEVEL: Level IV.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39311969What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.