Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311967›Full record

Observational studyEuropean journal of pediatrics2024

Impact of in situ simulation training on quality of postnatal stabilization and resuscitation-a before-and-after, non-controlled quality improvement study.

Lukas P Mileder, Nariae Baik-Schneditz, Jasmin Pansy, Bernhard Schwaberger, Wolfgang Raith, Alexander Avian, Georg M Schmölzer, Peter Wöckinger, Gerhard Pichler, Berndt Urlesberger

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in European journal of pediatrics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Challenges in implementing optimal perinatal regionalization: a scoping review.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Lukas P MilederDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria. lukas.mileder@medunigraz.at.
Nariae Baik-SchneditzDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Jasmin PansyDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Bernhard SchwabergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Wolfgang RaithDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Alexander AvianInstitute for Medical Informatics, Statistics and Documentation, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.
Georg M SchmölzerNorthern Alberta Neonatal Program, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Peter WöckingerIIDepartment of Paediatrics II, Neonatology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.
Gerhard PichlerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.
Berndt UrlesbergerDivision of Neonatology, Department of Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 34/2, 8036, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of in situ simulation-based training on quality indicators of patient care at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. A before-and-after, non-controlled quality improvement study was performed at the Division of Neonatology, Medical University of Graz. The educational intervention comprised a period of 4 months, with structured in situ simulation training delivered regularly for neonatal providers and nurses in interprofessional teams. The primary study outcome was the quality of non-technical skills and team interaction during actual postnatal stabilization and resuscitation. This was assessed using video recording during two 2-month observational phases before (pre-training) and after the educational intervention (post-training). Delivery room video recordings were assessed by two external, blinded neonatologists using the Anaesthetists' Non-Technical Skills (ANTS) score. Furthermore, we collected clinical patient data from video-recorded neonates during the pre- and post-training periods, and training participants' individual knowledge of neonatal resuscitation guidelines was assessed using a before- and after-questionnaire. A total of 48 healthcare professionals participated in 41 in situ simulation trainings. The level of non-technical skills and team interaction was already high in the pre-training period, and it did not further improve afterwards. Nonetheless, we observed a significant increase in the teamwork event "evaluation of plans" (0.5 [IQR 0.0-1.0] versus 1.0 [1.0-2.0], p = 0.049). Following the educational intervention, training participants' knowledge of neonatal resuscitation guidelines significantly improved, although there were no differences in secondary clinical outcome parameters.

conclusionWe have successfully implemented a neonatal in situ simulation training programme. The observed improvement in one teamwork event category in the post-training period demonstrates the effectiveness of the training curriculum, while also showing the potential of in situ simulation training for improving postnatal care and, ultimately, patient outcome. WHAT IS KNOWN: • In situ simulation-based training is conducted in the real healthcare environment, thus promoting experiential learning which is closely aligned with providers' actual work. • In situ simulation-based training may offer an additional benefit for patient outcomes in comparison to other instructional methodologies. WHAT IS NEW: • This observational study investigated translational patient outcomes in preterm neonates before and after delivery of high-frequency in situ simulation-based training at a level IV neonatal intensive care unit. • There was a significant increase in the frequency of one major teamwork event following the delivery of in situ simulation-based training, indicating a notable improvement in the non-technical skills domain, which is closely linked to actual team performance.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceIntensive Care Units, NeonatalQuality ImprovementResuscitationSimulation TrainingAdultFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatologyPatient Care TeamVideo RecordingIn situ trainingNeonateNon-technical skillsPostnatal stabilizationPretermResuscitationSimulation trainingVideo recording

Identifiers

PMID39311967
PMCPMC11473610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.