ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Development and validation of a CT based radiomics nomogram for preoperative prediction of ISUP/WHO grading in renal clear cell carcinoma.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Non-invasive prediction of nuclear grade in renal cell carcinoma using CT-Based radiomics: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Pooled it
- Preoperative identification of adverse pathology in clinically localized clear cell renal cell carcinoma: development and external validation of a contrast-enhanced ultrasound-based model.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- Review
- Artificial intelligence-enabled clinical decision support systems in preadmission testing: a scoping review of risk prediction, triage, and perioperative workflows (2020-2025).Journal of clinical monitoring and computing · 2026Article
- Enhanced ISUP grade prediction in prostate cancer using multi-center radiomics data.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundNuclear grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is crucial for its diagnosis and treatment.
objectiveTo develop and validate a machine learning model for preoperative assessment of ccRCC nuclear grading using CT radiomics. MATERIALS AND
methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 146 ccRCC patients who underwent surgery between June 2016 and January 2022 at two hospitals (the Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University with 117 cases and the Affiliated Cancer Hospital of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences with 29 cases). Radiomic features were extracted from preoperative abdominal CT images. Features reduction and selection were carried out using intraclass correlation efficient (ICCs), Spearman rank correlation coefficientsand and the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression method. Radiomics and clinical models were developed utilizing Support Vector Machine (SVM), Extremely Randomized Trees (Extra Trees), Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM), Random Forest (RF) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) algorithms. Subsequently, the radiomics nomogramwas developed incorporating independent clinical predictors and Rad_signature. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity, with decision curve analysis (DCA) assessing its clinical utility.
resultsWe extracted 1834 radiomic features from each CT sequence, with 1320 features passing through the ICCs screening process. 480 radiomics features were screened by Spearson correlation coefficient. Then, 15 radiomic features with non-zero coefficient values were determined by Lasso dimensionality reduction technique. The five machine learning methods effectively distinguished nuclear grades. The radiomics nomogram outperformed clinical radiological models and radiomics feature models in predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.936 (95% CI 0.885-0.986) for the training set and 0.896 (95% CI 0.716-1.000) for the external verification set. DCA indicated potential clinical applicability of the nomogram.
conclusionThe radiomics nomogram, developed by integrating clinically independent risk factors and and Rad_signature, demonstrated robust performance in preoperative ccRCC grading. It offers a non-invasive tool that aids in ccRCC grading and clinical decision-making, with potential to enhance treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39311950What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.