Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311949›Full record

ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025

Radiomics to predict PNI in ESCC.

Yang Li, Li Yang, Xiaolong Gu, Xiangming Wang, Qi Wang, Gaofeng Shi, Andu Zhang, Huiyan Deng, Xiaopeng Zhao, Jialiang Ren and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Yang LiThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Li YangThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaolong GuThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiangming Wang *The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. radiologywxm@163.com.
Qi WangThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Gaofeng ShiThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Andu Zhang *The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. zhangandu@hebmu.edu.cn.
Huiyan DengThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Xiaopeng ZhaoThe Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Jialiang RenGE Healthcare China, Beijing, China.
Aijun MiaoThe Fourth People's Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, China.
Shaolian LiThe Fourth People's Hospital of Hengshui, Hengshui, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study aimed to investigate whether contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) based radiomics analysis could noninvasively predict the perineural invasion (PNI) in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

methods398 patients with ESCC who underwent resection between February 2016 and March 2020 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly divided into training and testing cohorts in a 7:3 ratio. Radiomics analysis was performed on the arterial phase images of CECT scans. From these images, 1595 radiomics features were initially extracted. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), wilcoxon rank-sum test, spearman correlation analysis, and boruta algorithm were used for feature selection. Logistic regression (LR), random forest (RF), and support vector machine (SVM) models were established to preidict the PNI status. The performance of these radiomics models was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Decision curve analysis (DCA) was conducted to evaluate their clinical utility.

resultsSix radiomics features were retained to build the radiomics models. Among these models, the random forest (RF) model demonstrated superior performance. In the training cohort, the AUC value of the RF model was 0.773, compared to 0.627 for the logistic regression (LR) model and 0.712 for the support vector machine (SVM) model. Similarly, in the testing cohort, the RF model achieved an AUC value of 0.767, outperforming the LR model at 0.638 and the SVM model at 0.683. Decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested that the RF radiomics model exhibited the highest clinical utility.

conclusionsCECT-based radiomics analysis, particularly utilizing the RF, can noninvasively predict the PNI in ESCC preoperatively. This novel approach could enhance patient management by providing personalized information, thereby facilitating the development of individualized treatment strategies for ESCC patients.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaTomography, X-Ray ComputedAdultAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessPredictive Value of TestsRadiographic Image EnhancementRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedRadiomicsRetrospective StudiesContrast MediaComputed tomographyContrast-enhancedEsophageal squamous cell carcinomaPerineural invasionRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID39311949
PMCPMC11947035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.