ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
Predicting postoperative prognosis in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using a multiphase CT-based deep learning model.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSome clinicopathological risk stratification systems (CRSSs) such as the leibovich score have been used to predict the postoperative prognosis of patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but there are no reliable noninvasive preoperative indicators for predicting postoperative prognosis in clinical practice. PURPOSE: To assess the value of a deep learning (DL) model based on CT images in predicting the postoperative prognosis of patients with ccRCC. MATERIALS AND
methodsA total of 382 patients with ccRCC were retrospectively enrolled andallocated to training (n = 229) or testing (n = 153) cohorts at a 6:4 ratio. The features were extracted from precontrast-phase (PCP), corticomedullary-phase (CMP) and nephrographic-phase (NP) CT images with ResNet50, and then extreme learning machines (ELMs) were used to construct classification models. The DL model and Leibovich score were compared and combined. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate model performance.
resultsCompared with other single-phase DL models, the three-phase CT-based DL model achieved the best performance, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.839. Combining the three-phase DL model and the Leibovich score (AUC = 0.823) into a nomogram (AUC = 0.888) statistically improved performance (IDI
conclusionThe CT-based DL model could be valuable for preoperatively predicting the prognosis of patients with ccRCC, and combining it with the Leibovich score can further improve its predictive performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39311948What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.