Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311762›Full record

ArticleGigaScience2024

Genomic insights into endangerment and conservation of the garlic-fruit tree (Malania oleifera), a plant species with extremely small populations.

Yuanting Shen, Lidan Tao, Rengang Zhang, Gang Yao, Minjie Zhou, Weibang Sun, Yongpeng Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in GigaScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. High-quality genome ofPlant diversity · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yuanting ShenYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.
Lidan TaoYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-1396-0524
Rengang ZhangYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8028-9208
Gang YaoYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3628-7088
Minjie ZhouYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.
Weibang SunYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0009-0009-5246-9226
Yongpeng MaYunnan Key Laboratory for Integrative Conservation of Plant Species with Extremely Small Populations, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China.ORCID 0000-0002-7725-3677

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Yunnan Province 202001AS070019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdvanced whole-genome sequencing techniques enable covering nearly all genome nucleotide variations and thus can provide deep insights into protecting endangered species. However, the use of genomic data to make conservation strategies is still rare, particularly for endangered plants. Here we performed comprehensive conservation genomic analysis for Malania oleifera, an endangered tree species with a high amount of nervonic acid. We used whole-genome resequencing data of 165 samples, covering 16 populations across the entire distribution range, to investigate the formation reasons of its extremely small population sizes and to evaluate the possible genomic offsets and changes of ecology niche suitability under future climate change.

resultsAlthough M. oleifera maintains relatively high genetic diversity among endangered woody plants (θπ = 3.87 × 10-3), high levels of inbreeding have been observed, which have reduced genetic diversity in 3 populations (JM, NP, and BM2) and caused the accumulation of deleterious mutations. Repeated bottleneck events, recent inbreeding (∼490 years ago), and anthropogenic disturbance to wild habitats have aggravated the fragmentation of M. oleifera and made it endangered. Due to the significant effect of higher average annual temperature, populations distributed in low altitude exhibit a greater genomic offset. Furthermore, ecological niche modeling shows the suitable habitats for M. oleifera will decrease by 71.15% and 98.79% in 2100 under scenarios SSP126 and SSP585, respectively.

conclusionsThe basic realizations concerning the threats to M. oleifera provide scientific foundation for defining management and adaptive units, as well as prioritizing populations for genetic rescue. Meanwhile, we highlight the importance of integrating genomic offset and ecological niche modeling to make targeted conservation actions under future climate change. Overall, our study provides a paradigm for genomics-directed conservation.

Indexed as

Endangered SpeciesGenetic VariationGenome, PlantClimate ChangeConservation of Natural ResourcesEcosystemGenetics, PopulationGenomicsconservation genomicsdeleterious mutationdemographic historyecological niche modelinggenomic offsetrecent inbreeding

Identifiers

PMID39311762
PMCPMC11417964

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.