ReviewNucleic acid therapeutics2024
An Evaluation of First-in-Human Studies for RNA Oligonucleotides.
Review in Nucleic acid therapeutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lipid nanoparticle delivery of antisense gapmers attenuates pathology in a mouse model of facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Divalent siRNA for prion disease.Nucleic acids research · 2026Article
- Divalent siRNA for prion disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Systemic distribution of tricyclo-DNA antisense oligonucleotide following intratracheal instillation in the mouse.NAR molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Tailored antisense oligonucleotides for ultrarare CNS diseases: An experience-based best practice framework for individual patient evaluation.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Most oligonucleotide therapeutics use Watson-Crick-Franklin base-pairing hybridization to target RNA and mitigate disease-related protein production. Using targets that were previously inaccessible to small molecules and biologics, synthetic nucleotides have provided treatments for severely debilitating and life-threatening diseases. However, these therapeutics possess unique pharmacologies that require specific considerations for their distribution, clearance, and other clinical pharmacology characteristics. Namely, one hurdle in the drug development of these therapeutics remains the prediction of human dose that results in exposures comparable with or below those seen at no observed adverse effect level in animals. For first-in-human (FIH) clinical trials, this often involves allometric scaling based on body surface area (BSA) or body weight (BW). In this study, we reviewed the current literature and surveyed elements across 16 approved oligonucleotide therapeutic New Drug Applications approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in the period from September 1998 to January 2024, and 89 Investigational New Drug (IND) programs with available FIH clinical trials conducted from January 2015 to January 2024, to understand dose selection in early-stage development of oligonucleotide therapeutics. The surveyed elements across these programs include study design, route of administration, dosing regimen, interspecies scaling approach, and the most sensitive species. Of 89 IND programs and 16 approved therapeutics, intravenous and subcutaneous were the most common route of administration, no observable adverse event levels were frequently derived from nonhuman primates, BSA and BW were adjusted for in similar frequencies, patients were predominantly enrolled in FIH trials, and the most common design was a single or multiple ascending dose trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.