Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39311635›Full record

ArticleTrends in hearing

Automated Measurement of Speech Recognition, Reaction Time, and Speech Rate and Their Relation to Self-Reported Listening Effort for Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Listeners Using various Maskers.

Inga Holube, Stefan Taesler, Saskia Ibelings, Martin Hansen, Jasper Ooster

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Trends in hearing. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Inga HolubeInstitute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0009-0001-1936-8855
Stefan TaeslerInstitute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.
Saskia IbelingsInstitute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6607-4884
Martin HansenInstitute of Hearing Technology and Audiology, Jade University of Applied Sciences, Oldenburg, Germany.
Jasper OosterCluster of Excellence Hearing4all, Oldenburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In speech audiometry, the speech-recognition threshold (SRT) is usually established by adjusting the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) until 50% of the words or sentences are repeated correctly. However, these conditions are rarely encountered in everyday situations. Therefore, for a group of 15 young participants with normal hearing and a group of 12 older participants with hearing impairment, speech-recognition scores were determined at SRT and at four higher SNRs using several stationary and fluctuating maskers. Participants' verbal responses were recorded, and participants were asked to self-report their listening effort on a categorical scale (self-reported listening effort, SR-LE). The responses were analyzed using an Automatic Speech Recognizer (ASR) and compared to the results of a human examiner. An intraclass correlation coefficient of

Indexed as

Acoustic StimulationAuditory ThresholdPerceptual MaskingReaction TimeSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedAge FactorsAutomationCase-Control StudiesFemaleHearingHearing LossHumansMaleMiddle Agedfluctuating maskershearing impairmentlistening effortspeech intelligibilityverbal response time

Identifiers

PMID39311635
PMCPMC11421406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.