ArticleJournal of virology2024
A model for polyomavirus helicase activity derived in part from the AlphaFold2 structure of SV40 T-antigen.
Article in Journal of virology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The mechanism used by polyomavirus and other viral SF3 helicases to unwind DNA at replication forks remains unknown. Using AlphaFold2, we have determined the structure of a representative SF3 helicase, the SV40 T-antigen (T-ag). This model has been analyzed in terms of the features of T-ag required for helicase activity, particularly the proximity of the T-ag origin binding domain (OBD) to the replication fork and the distribution of basic residues on the surface of the OBD that are known to play roles in DNA unwinding. These and related studies provide additional evidence that the T-ag OBDs have a role in the unwinding of DNA at the replication fork. Nuclear magnetic resonance and modeling experiments also indicate that protonated histidines on the surface of the T-ag OBD play an important role in the unwinding process, and additional modeling studies indicate that protonated histidines are essential in other SF3 and SF6 helicases. Finally, a model for T-ag's helicase activity is presented, which is a variant of the "rope climber." According to this model, the hands are the N-terminal OBD domains that interact with the replication fork, while the C-terminal helicase domains contain the feet that bind to single-stranded DNA. IMPORTANCE: Enzymes termed helicases are essential for the replication of DNA tumor viruses. Unfortunately, much remains to be determined about this class of enzymes, including their structures and the mechanism(s) they employ to unwind DNA. Herein, we present the full-length structure of a model helicase encoded by a DNA tumor virus. Moreover, this AI-based structure has been analyzed in terms of its basic functional properties, such as the orientation of the helicase at replication forks and the relative locations of the amino acid residues that are critical for helicase activity. Obtaining this information is important because it permits proposals regarding how DNA is routed through these model helicases. Also presented is structural evidence that the conclusions drawn from our detailed analyses of one model helicase, encoded by one class of tumor viruses, are likely to apply to other viral and eukaryotic helicases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.